--On Sunday, August 8, 2021 12:41 PM +0100 Howard Chu wrote:
All this nitpicking over *process* is wasting time.
It's not nitpicking, it's trying to establish something well written and
concise. Clearly all that you feel is relevant is what matters.
As an aside, here's an example of a
--On Sunday, August 8, 2021 6:32 PM +0100 Howard Chu wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
For 2.5, we deprecated:
back-ndb
back-sql
back-perl
Should these be removed for 2.6?
I still routinely build back-perl in master. Is there any reason to
remove it?
Not necessarily, that's why I star
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
For 2.5, we deprecated:
back-ndb
back-sql
back-perl
Should these be removed for 2.6?
I still routinely build back-perl in master. Is there any reason to remove it?
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun ht
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Sunday, August 8, 2021 3:21 AM +0100 Howard Chu wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Saturday, August 7, 2021 1:31 PM +0100 Howard Chu
wrote:
Also for clarity: We consider "Critical" bugs to include security
flaws resulting in unauthorized data disclos
