Re: New release policy for OpenLDAP

2020-01-29 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:09 PM +0100 Michael Ströder wrote: On 1/29/20 7:49 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 6:52 PM +0100 Michael Ströder wrote: On 1/28/20 7:45 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Also, I really really really would like 2.4.49 to

Re: New release policy for OpenLDAP

2020-01-29 Thread Michael Ströder
On 1/29/20 7:49 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 6:52 PM +0100 Michael Ströder > wrote: > >> On 1/28/20 7:45 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >>> Also, I really really really would like 2.4.49 to be the end of 2.4, >>> outside the possibility of some critical CVEs.

Re: New release policy for OpenLDAP

2020-01-29 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 6:52 PM +0100 Michael Ströder wrote: On 1/28/20 7:45 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Also, I really really really would like 2.4.49 to be the end of 2.4, outside the possibility of some critical CVEs. But that's just your personal goal which is leaving sys

Re: New release policy for OpenLDAP

2020-01-29 Thread Michael Ströder
On 1/28/20 7:45 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > Also, I really really really would like 2.4.49 to be the end of 2.4, > outside the possibility of some critical CVEs. But that's just your personal goal which is leaving systems in production unpatched until you feel you're done. IMO that's totally w