--On Thursday, April 18, 2019 4:39 PM +0200 Clément OUDOT
wrote:
Hello,
I have opened this one on overlay memberOf:
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi?findid=9000
I think this is a bug, but I don't know if the solution I propose to
resolve it is good.
Hi Clément,
I looked at that one,
--On Thursday, April 18, 2019 8:14 PM +0200 Michael Ströder
wrote:
Hi Quanah,
On 4/18/19 6:12 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I'm looking at the patches SuSE applies to OpenLDAP, and it would be
nice to have some engagement from SuSE on kicking some of these back,
I'm sometimes trying to pu
Hi Quanah,
On 4/18/19 6:12 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I'm looking at the patches SuSE applies to OpenLDAP, and it would be
nice to have some engagement from SuSE on kicking some of these back,
I'm sometimes trying to push them to coordinate with upstream. Problem
is that SLE customer bugs
Hi Michael,
I'm looking at the patches SuSE applies to OpenLDAP, and it would be nice
to have some engagement from SuSE on kicking some of these back,
particularly something like 0017-Fix-segfault-in-nops.patch, which it
appears is to address ITS#8759. Do you know what we need to do on our en
Hello,
I have opened this one on overlay memberOf:
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi?findid=9000
I think this is a bug, but I don't know if the solution I propose to
resolve it is good.
--
Clément Oudot | Identity Solutions Manager
clement.ou...@worteks.com
Worteks | https://www.worteks.c
