--On Thursday, October 12, 2017 1:03 AM +0200 Michael Ströder
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
---
Purely for RE25:
---
What about ITS#8714?
RFE: Sendout EXTENDED operation message in back-sock
This is already in master. Anything currently in mast
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Friday, October 06, 2017 5:43 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> wrote:
>
>>> This is debatable:
>>>
>>> 1. OpenLDAP 2.4.x accepts modify operations with LDAP_MOD_INCREMENT
>>>
>>> 2. OpenLDAP 2.4.x sends modify operations via back-sock to external
>>> listeners
>>>
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> ---
> Purely for RE25:
> ---
What about ITS#8714?
RFE: Sendout EXTENDED operation message in back-sock
Could this make it into RE25?
Another one which really strikes me:
(ITS#7796) LDAP_DEBUG_TRACE for "not indexed" log message
--On Friday, October 06, 2017 5:43 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
This is debatable:
1. OpenLDAP 2.4.x accepts modify operations with LDAP_MOD_INCREMENT
2. OpenLDAP 2.4.x sends modify operations via back-sock to external
listeners
Therefore I'd consider this rather a fix than a new fea
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 8:34 PM +0100 Howard Chu
wrote:
8720 - 221dd433995a480599d3038d109e63e0b570d84d
Commit has wrong ITS. Fixes an observed issue in the field. Seems
worthwhile
What commit ID? This is the same as above.
Whoops. :) It is bb62d9cb73
--On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 8:34 PM +0100 Howard Chu
wrote:
8720 - 221dd433995a480599d3038d109e63e0b570d84d
Commit has wrong ITS. Fixes an observed issue in the field. Seems
worthwhile
What commit ID? This is the same as above.
Whoops. :) It is bb62d9cb732c894023c5c9f5893acf40add737
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
The following commits may be applicable for the next RE24 release
8678 - 375db33d13ab1fe414419a6f9cfb0b41c999862d
Note: Says it's a hack, and the underlying issue was resolved at the location
that stemmed this issue by using sortvals on the related attribute. Not sur
