Thank you for your effort on that investigation. Hopefully this issue
can be fixed somehow. For now, we tweaked some calls to runLater and
enterNestedEventLoop to be called a little bit less often.
On 11/03/2025 20:40, Martin Fox wrote:
I entered a bug https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-83517
Reproduced, thanks! I am going to create a bug shortly.
-andy
From: openjfx-dev on behalf of John Hendrikx
Date: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 at 07:52
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.org
Subject: Re: Probably bug: UI changes made while minimized, not reflected upon
restore/maximize
Here's a simpler v
Thank you for reporting the issue!
I’ve created https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351867
-andy
From: openjfx-dev on behalf of Cormac Redmond
Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 18:36
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.org
Subject: Re: Probably bug: UI changes made while minimized, not reflected upon
r
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 13:31:11 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Should we specify that the `@Deprecated` annotation on preview features be
> marked as `forRemoval=true`
wouldn't this send a wrong message?
could we invent a new annotation `@Preview` ?
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.o
> This provides and uses a new implementation of `ExpressionHelper`, called
> `ListenerManager` with improved semantics.
>
> See also #837 for a previous attempt which instead of triggering nested
> emissions immediately (like this PR and `ExpressionHelper`) would wait until
> the current emiss
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:24:08 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
> > Should we specify that the `@Deprecated` annotation on preview features be
> > marked as `forRemoval=true`
>
> wouldn't this send a wrong message?
Yes, that's the main counter-argument. Unlike incubator modules, which
necessarily nee
Here's a simpler version that shows the problem. It appears that a stage
in iconified mode (minimized) is simply not doing any updates when it
becomes visible again. In my system, when I click the task bar to show
the stage, I just see an empty box (with a color that is clearly not the
correct back
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:16:54 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
>> This PR contains a definition of preview features for JavaFX, as well as a
>> helper class to verify that an application has opted into preview features.
>
> Michael Strauß has updated the pull request incrementally with four
> additiona
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:23:44 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This PR adds the release notes for the JavaFX 24 release. This will first go
>> into master, and then be backported to the jfx24 branch so it will be
>> available in that branch when JavaFX 24 is published (and from there also
>> sync
Great -- thanks John & Andy!
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 15:06, Andy Goryachev
wrote:
> Thank you for reporting the issue!
>
> I’ve created https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351867
>
>
>
> -andy
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *openjfx-dev on behalf of Cormac
> Redmond
> *Date: *Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 18
On 2/27/25 7:15 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
The POC I have for this (linux-only at the moment) is at
https://github.com/johanvos/jdk/tree/jfxpoc-blog
That's very clever, Johan. I never thought of using the JDK repository
as-is to build JavaFX. I agree it's "one of the most excellent build
systems fo
> This PR contains a definition of preview features for JavaFX, as well as a
> helper class to verify that an application has opted into preview features.
Michael Strauß has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
warning can be suppressed
-
> Implementation of
> [`EXTENDED`](https://gist.github.com/mstr2/0befc541ee7297b6db2865cc5e4dbd09)
> and `EXTENDED_UTILITY` stage style.
Michael Strauß has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
tweak header button glyph scaling
--
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 18:19:53 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
>> Allows MenuBar to be created in a background thread by delaying
>> MenuBarSkin::rebuildUI() call until after the MenuBar becomes a part of the
>> scene graph.
>
> Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:30:43 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
>> Summary
>> ---
>>
>> Adds a thread check to a number of `Platform` methods:
>>
>> accessibilityActiveProperty()
>> getPreferences()
>> isAccessibilityActive()
>>
>> These methods will throw an `IllegalStateException` if called on a
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:24:08 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
> > Should we specify that the `@Deprecated` annotation on preview features be
> > marked as `forRemoval=true`
>
> wouldn't this send a wrong message? could we invent a new annotation
> `@Preview` ?
We could, but then we'd lose the integ
issue : build fails on debug mode. invalid casting
Solution: the casting should be with char* , need to use SourceUTF8().data()
-
Commit messages:
- 8351653: Webkit debug build failure after update to 620.1
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1732/files
Webrev: https://webre
> This provides and uses a new implementation of `ExpressionHelper`, called
> `ListenerManager` with improved semantics.
>
> See also #837 for a previous attempt which instead of triggering nested
> emissions immediately (like this PR and `ExpressionHelper`) would wait until
> the current emiss
18 matches
Mail list logo
