Re: RFR: JDK-8312528: Move Subscription interface from javafx.beans to javafx.util

2023-07-26 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 22:15:03 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote: > The Subscription interface is independent from FX beans and has uses > unrelated to beans, it should therefore be placed in javafx.util. > > This should be fixed before > [JDK-8311123](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311123) is rele

Re: RFR: JDK-8312528: Move Subscription interface from javafx.beans to javafx.util

2023-07-26 Thread John Hendrikx
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 22:40:17 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> The Subscription interface is independent from FX beans and has uses >> unrelated to beans, it should therefore be placed in javafx.util. >> >> This should be fixed before >> [JDK-8311123](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311123)

Re: RFR: JDK-8312528: Move Subscription interface from javafx.beans to javafx.util

2023-07-21 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 22:15:03 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote: > The Subscription interface is independent from FX beans and has uses > unrelated to beans, it should therefore be placed in javafx.util. > > This should be fixed before > [JDK-8311123](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311123) is rele

Re: RFR: JDK-8312528: Move Subscription interface from javafx.beans to javafx.util

2023-07-21 Thread Nir Lisker
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 22:15:03 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote: > The Subscription interface is independent from FX beans and has uses > unrelated to beans, it should therefore be placed in javafx.util. > > This should be fixed before > [JDK-8311123](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311123) is rele