Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23 [v2]

2025-07-08 Thread Joeri Sykora
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 20:29:59 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 23. >> >> In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should >> increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. >>

Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23 [v2]

2025-07-08 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 20:29:59 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 23. >> >> In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should >> increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. >>

Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23

2025-07-08 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 17:26:31 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > I will also need to merge master some time after #1832 is integrated, since > there will be a (trivial) merge conflict for me to resolve. This is now merged. The trivial conflict was in the surrounding context, not the diffs themselves

Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23 [v2]

2025-07-08 Thread Kevin Rushforth
> This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 23. > > In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should > increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. > Additionally, there is an ongoing cost to keeping JavaFX builda

Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23

2025-06-18 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:57:43 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 23. > > In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should > increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. > Addi

Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23

2025-06-18 Thread Joeri Sykora
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:57:43 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 23. > > In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should > increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. > Addi

Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23

2025-06-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:57:43 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 23. > > In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should > increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. > Addi

Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23

2025-06-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:57:43 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 23. > > In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should > increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. > Addi

Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23

2025-06-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:33:19 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: >> This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 23. >> >> In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should >> increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. >>

Re: RFR: 8359387: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 23

2025-06-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:57:43 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 23. > > In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should > increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. > Addi