Re: RFR: 8347305: RichTextArea Follow-up [v2]

2025-01-10 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:24:05 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: >> The changes: >> >> - minor fixes in the behavior document (DELETE_WORD_PREVIOUS) >> - Default width of RTA is less than half the size of TextArea (176 vs 478 on >> my Windows 11 system). Earlier the height was also too small, but you >

Re: RFR: 8347305: RichTextArea Follow-up [v2]

2025-01-10 Thread Andy Goryachev
> The changes: > > - minor fixes in the behavior document (DELETE_WORD_PREVIOUS) > - Default width of RTA is less than half the size of TextArea (176 vs 478 on > my Windows 11 system). Earlier the height was also too small, but you already > fixed that. > > The following is not an issue (works

Re: RFR: 8347305: RichTextArea Follow-up

2025-01-10 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 15:48:43 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: > The changes: > > - minor fixes in the behavior document (DELETE_WORD_PREVIOUS) > - Default width of RTA is less than half the size of TextArea (176 vs 478 on > my Windows 11 system). Earlier the height was also too small, but you already

Re: RFR: 8347305: RichTextArea Follow-up

2025-01-10 Thread Andy Goryachev
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:07:38 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > It might just be an issue with the demo, I see "use content width" option enabled, this is not the right use case. When the RTA is constrained, the useContentWidth should be off. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/

Re: RFR: 8347305: RichTextArea Follow-up

2025-01-10 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 15:48:43 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: > The following is not an issue (works as designed): > > * When running the demos, the current line highlight overlaps and obscures > focus outline on right side (verified on Windows and Linux). It might just be an issue with the demo, be