inline
On 7/24/2023 5:09 PM, Michael Strauß wrote:
My comments below:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 1:18 AM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
This seems like it might be a useful feature, if enough applications
would want to take advantage of it.
If we proceed, I have a couple comments:
* All of our existin
> This seems like it might be a useful feature, if enough applications
> would want to take advantage of it.
I think this feature is mainly useful for style themes, because it
allows creating
subtle animations for state transitions (hover, click, etc).
Applications will probably
continue to use th
My comments below:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 1:18 AM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
>
> This seems like it might be a useful feature, if enough applications
> would want to take advantage of it.
>
> If we proceed, I have a couple comments:
>
> * All of our existing CSS attributes use "-fx-" as a prefix. My
This seems like it might be a useful feature, if enough applications
would want to take advantage of it.
If we proceed, I have a couple comments:
* All of our existing CSS attributes use "-fx-" as a prefix. My
preference would be to do that for transitions as well, absent a
compelling reason
I think this is a good feature to have in JavaFX, especially as it makes it much easier to animate the UI.This looks good to me API wise. Since you implemented this as in modern CSS, this is also very easy for people coming from the Web.-- Marius
Am 17.07.23, 21:24 schrieb "Michael Strauß" :
I'd love to see this feature in JavaFX. This would allow for much
cleaner (and better reusable) implementations of modern-looking UI which
I'd like to have for current and future JavaFX projects. In the current
state of JavaFX, you'd usually need to roll your own custom control
skins which is n
Here's an updated summary of the proposed feature:
https://gist.github.com/mstr2/c72f8c9faa87de14926978f517a6018a
And here's the full implementation:
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/870
I'm interested in hearing from you whether you think this is a useful
feature and whether the proposed API
My comments inline:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:28 PM John Hendrikx wrote:
>
> Should this also provide fx-ease-in (etc) if you want to be compatible
> with other FX animations instead of CSS ones (which have little meaning
> in FX apps) ?
Yes, I think that's a good idea.
> > Note that step-wis
Just a few questions inline:
On 11/07/2023 21:52, Michael Strauß wrote:
Easing Functions
CSS Transitions specifies the `transition-timing-function`
sub-property to define easing functions (see CSS Easing Functions
[4]). Here is a list of all easing functions available in CSS Eas
