On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 22:15:03 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> The Subscription interface is independent from FX beans and has uses
> unrelated to beans, it should therefore be placed in javafx.util.
>
> This should be fixed before
> [JDK-8311123](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311123) is rele
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 22:40:17 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> The Subscription interface is independent from FX beans and has uses
>> unrelated to beans, it should therefore be placed in javafx.util.
>>
>> This should be fixed before
>> [JDK-8311123](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311123)
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 22:15:03 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> The Subscription interface is independent from FX beans and has uses
> unrelated to beans, it should therefore be placed in javafx.util.
>
> This should be fixed before
> [JDK-8311123](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311123) is rele
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 22:15:03 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> The Subscription interface is independent from FX beans and has uses
> unrelated to beans, it should therefore be placed in javafx.util.
>
> This should be fixed before
> [JDK-8311123](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311123) is rele
The Subscription interface is independent from FX beans and has uses unrelated
to beans, it should therefore be placed in javafx.util.
This should be fixed before
[JDK-8311123](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311123) is released.
-
Commit messages:
- Move Subscription to java
