On Wed, 7 May 2025 15:42:03 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
>> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
>> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
>> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
>> func
On Wed, 7 May 2025 15:42:03 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
>> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
>> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
>> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
>> func
On Wed, 7 May 2025 15:42:03 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
>> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
>> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
>> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
>> func
On Wed, 7 May 2025 15:43:18 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
> so the group protocol is **not** needed for the progress bar/indicator?
What? It is required see the definition for the interface:
`@interface JFXProgressIndicatorAccessibility :
JFXGroupAccessibility`
-
PR Comment: h
On Wed, 7 May 2025 15:42:03 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
>> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
>> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
>> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
>> func
On Wed, 7 May 2025 15:42:03 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
>> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
>> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
>> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
>> func
> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
> functionality of the code since it has to behave exactly in the s
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:30:34 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
>> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
>> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
>> fun
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:52:15 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
> How can one test the group protocol change?
Right now the group protocol is only used as a parent protocol for the
composite component such as ProgressBar and the only way to properly test it is
to add the debugging output to methods su
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 04:37:59 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
> functio
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 04:37:59 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
> functio
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 04:37:59 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
> functio
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:25:06 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
> Are these changes testable? If so, could you please describe what we are
> supposed to see during the testing?
This fix covers two controls - ProgressBar and ProgressIndicator, i used
Ensemble, it has pages for both with values and just
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:29:11 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
>> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
>> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
>> fun
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 04:37:59 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
> functio
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 04:37:59 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
> functio
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 04:37:59 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
> Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
> accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
> 8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
> functio
Initial implementation. In order to implement progress indicator the group
accessibility protocol has to be implemented too so this is also a fix for
8351773. There are commented out sections that can be used to verify the
functionality of the code since it has to behave exactly in the same way
18 matches
Mail list logo
