On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 06:23:02 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> This PR removes the pausing logic from AbstractPrimaryTimer. The test that
> is using it wasn't actually testing anything in AbstractPrimaryTimer itself,
> and no other code needs this pausing code.
Looks good to me too and always good t
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 06:23:02 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> This PR removes the pausing logic from AbstractPrimaryTimer. The test that
> is using it wasn't actually testing anything in AbstractPrimaryTimer itself,
> and no other code needs this pausing code.
Good cleanup. Without digging a bit mo
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 06:23:02 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> This PR removes the pausing logic from AbstractPrimaryTimer. The test that
> is using it wasn't actually testing anything in AbstractPrimaryTimer itself,
> and no other code needs this pausing code.
Looks good.
-
Marked as
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 06:23:02 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> This PR removes the pausing logic from AbstractPrimaryTimer. The test that
> is using it wasn't actually testing anything in AbstractPrimaryTimer itself,
> and no other code needs this pausing code.
nice cleanup!
-
Marked a
This PR removes the pausing logic from AbstractPrimaryTimer. The test that is
using it wasn't actually testing anything in AbstractPrimaryTimer itself, and
no other code needs this pausing code.
-
Commit messages:
- Remove unused code
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/155