Re: [jfx-tests] RFR: 8315809: Fix copyright lines in jfx-tests repo after JDK-8315409

2023-09-08 Thread Alexandre Iline
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 18:22:38 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > As mentioned in the JBS Description, I generated this PR by running the same > copyright tool we use to update the jfx repo, with a slight modification to > not filter out those files that already had "Copyright.*2023", since those > ar

Re: [jfx-tests] RFR: 8315809: Fix copyright lines in jfx-tests repo after JDK-8315409

2023-09-08 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 18:22:38 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > As mentioned in the JBS Description, I generated this PR by running the same > copyright tool we use to update the jfx repo, with a slight modification to > not filter out those files that already had "Copyright.*2023", since those > ar

Re: [jfx-tests] RFR: 8315809: Fix copyright lines in jfx-tests repo after JDK-8315409

2023-09-06 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 18:22:38 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > As mentioned in the JBS Description, I generated this PR by running the same > copyright tool we use to update the jfx repo, with a slight modification to > not filter out those files that already had "Copyright.*2023", since those > ar

[jfx-tests] RFR: 8315809: Fix copyright lines in jfx-tests repo after JDK-8315409

2023-09-06 Thread Kevin Rushforth
As mentioned in the JBS Description, I generated this PR by running the same copyright tool we use to update the jfx repo, with a slight modification to not filter out those files that already had "Copyright.*2023", since those are the ones that need to be fixed up for incorrect formatting. I m