On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 22:41:29 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
>> The RichTextArea control
>> ([JDK-8301121](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301121)), or any custom
>> control that needs non-trivial navigation within complex or wrapped text
>> needs a public API to get information about text layo
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 19:23:47 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
>> Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> convert to wrapper
>
> One additional thought/question:
>
> There is a need to extract a few more data points from
when ready.
Regards
Jurgen
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:43:25 +0200, PavelTurk
wrote:
Hello all.
JavaFX adds its own shutdown hook. That gives many problems when it is
necessary to work with application,
when system is shutting down, for example, if user presses CTRL+C. The
first problem I desc
e this. In both cases the "Too many touch points reported" issue
will need to be readdressed.
It would be nice to see this move forward somehow.
Thanks again,
Jurgen
On Tue, 04 Jun 2024 18:28:47 +0200, Markus Mack wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2024 14:25:51 GMT, Michael Strauß
wrote:
Hi All
Can JDK-8289115 (Touch events are not dispatched after upgrade to JavaFX
17) please get some attention again for the next release.
Thanks, regards
Jurgen
A big THANK YOU to everybody that was part of this process.
It's very much appreciated !
Regards
Jurgen
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:27:44 +0200, Nir Lisker wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 23:59:50 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
Added a utility method to run code on the FX thread if it's not
did before. There are bound to be other applications out
there that are going to find themselves in a similar position.
PLEASE !
Regards
Jurgen
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:15:31 +0200, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
Thank you to Jurgen for raising the question and to Nir, John, and
Michael for evaluati
indeed so, then could you please explain the
purpose of the receiversLocked and animationTimersLocked flags, as well as
the point of receivers.clone() and animationTimers.clone() all of which
indicate to the contrary.
Thanks, regards
Jurgen
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:36:16 +0200, John Hendrikx
rame
setTime
animation.setCurrentTicks
clipInterpolator.interpolate
animation.doJumpTo
sync(false)
setCurrentTicks
clipCore.jumpTo
timeline.getStatus()
clipInter
le( "-fx-text-fill: green" ); // This is OK
memoryLabel.setText( "This is NOT okay" ); // This is NOT, move
to before play
Interesting API idea, however I don't think it's really needed for
sensible developers.
Regards
Jurgen
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:53:48
ay this could happen. Furthermore it doesn't appear as though
the animation code can be left in some strange inconsistent state as a
result of this.
Jurgen
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:58:20 +0200, John Hendrikx
wrote:
This seems like a reasonable use case, and perhaps this was the
http://javafx.com/fxml/1"; fx:controller="TestView">
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 17:08:41 +0200, Nir Lisker wrote:
Hi Jurgen,
What I'm confused about the most is what it is you are actually trying
to do that necessitates the use of anim
hen during the pulse the method was invoked. If play
is invoked just before the next pulse then the 'animation' could be
running, or if stop is invoked just as a pulse completes then it will not
be executing. Otherwise the 'animation' will only actually be (not)
executing in the next pulse.
Hope this clarifies things.
Regards
Jurgen
propriate place, however the test
case will require it)
2. Changing the arrays in AbstractPrimaryTimer to be
CopyOnWriteArrayList(s) and removing previously supporting array code.
3. Adding a test based on the one supplied in JDK-8159048 to check that a
NPE isn't thrown anymore.
Hope t
mes occur but not put a
burden on the existing code in the wild and allow views to be loaded with
Task call() without worries.
Thanks, regards
Jurgen
On 8/18/2023 4:17 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
As a heads-up for app developers who use JavaFX animation (including
Animation, along w
not put a
burden on the existing code in the wild and allow views to be loaded with
Task call() without worries.
Thanks, regards
Jurgen
On 8/18/2023 4:17 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
As a heads-up for app developers who use JavaFX animation (including
Animation, along with any subclasses, and An
irect result of fixing JDK-8249737 RuntimeException: Too
many touch points reported.
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249737)
Please reopen both of these issues.
Thanks, Jurgen
49737 RuntimeException: Too
many touch points reported.
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249737)
Please reopen both of these issues.
Thanks, Jurgen
18 matches
Mail list logo