On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:48:00 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> Requirement:
> We want to be able to test a JavaFX SDK built somewhere else other than on
> current machine or current repo on same machine. Which means we should be
> able to run the unit and system tests with a different JavaFX SD
This change modifies `ScrollPaneBehavior` to only consume keys that are
targetted at it. As `KeyEvent`s are in almost all cases only intended for the
targetted node (as visually that's where the user expects the keyboard input to
go, as per normal UI rules) consuming key events that bubble up i
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 21:17:55 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> This change modifies `ScrollPaneBehavior` to only consume keys that are
> targetted at it. As `KeyEvent`s are in almost all cases only intended for
> the targetted node (as visually that's where the user expects the keyboard
> input to
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 21:17:55 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> This change modifies `ScrollPaneBehavior` to only consume keys that are
> targetted at it. As `KeyEvent`s are in almost all cases only intended for
> the targetted node (as visually that's where the user expects the keyboard
> input to
Hi Andy,
Glad to hear the TraversalEvent is gone. I’ll try go take a look at the new
implementation next week.
> > There’s a case in the current control set that this API doesn’t cover.
> > ToggleButtons intercept the arrow keys so they can implement a cyclic
> > traversal policy among buttons
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 21:33:10 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This PR modifies the header and footer of the javadoc-generated API docs to
> add "DRAFT $VER-ea+$BLD" to clearly identify an ea build of the docs, and
> also to make it clear which build number the docs refer to. This matches was
> th
This PR modifies the header and footer of the javadoc-generated API docs to add
"DRAFT $VER-ea+$BLD" to clearly identify an ea build of the docs, and also to
make it clear which build number the docs refer to. This matches was the JDK
does. For GA builds, there will be no change to what we gener
For some reason mails on the openjfx-dev mailinglist coming from
mar...@martinfox.com are not coming through to me
I have the same problem.
It sometimes takes a while, and sometimes they never get through :/ It
may indeed by Gmail, as I use that as well for the mailinglist.
--John
On 26/09
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 01:45:14 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
> Restored some behavior in genVSproperties that enabled ARM builds and
> cross-compilation on Windows. Verified that I can build on ARM but have no
> way of testing other architectures.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 01:45:14 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
> Restored some behavior in genVSproperties that enabled ARM builds and
> cross-compilation on Windows. Verified that I can build on ARM but have no
> way of testing other architectures.
Looks good.
-
Marked as reviewed by kcr (
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:30:47 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
> Fixing the wrong TriangleMesh.vertexFormat property.
> TriangleMesh.getVertexFormat() and TriangleMesh.vertexProperty().get()
> initially returned different values, which are now fixed.
I changed the title to `TriangleMesh.vertexForm
> Public APIs for focus traversal and the focus traversal policy:
>
> https://github.com/andy-goryachev-oracle/Test/blob/main/doc/FocusTraversal/FocusTraversal.md
>
> This work is loosely based on the patch
> https://cr.openjdk.org/~jgiles/8061673/
Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request inc
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:13:40 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport of new `SECURITY.md` file to the `jfx23u` repo.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: bd99f722
Author:Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx23u/commit/bd99f722effb799ae4b3023264c05b2d
Hello everyone.
JavaFX is missing methods that are the equivalent of the macOS integration
methods in java.awt.Desktop.
I have experimented with calling these methods in a JavaFX application, but
they do nothing.
Is there any interest in adding something similar to either the
HostServices, Platf
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:13:40 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport of new `SECURITY.md` file to the `jfx23u` repo.
@johanvos Can you approve this? (it doesn't require review, but does require
approval)
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx23u/pull/23#issuecomment-237711
Clean backport of new `SECURITY.md` file to the `jfx23u` repo.
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 0dd0c794c3b08f816e7618026d5c90deaf952046
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx23u/pull/23/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx23u&pr=23&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 09:58:53 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao
wrote:
>> This replaces obsolete XIM and uses gtk api for IME.
>> Gtk uses [ibus](https://github.com/ibus/ibus)
>>
>> Gtk3+ uses relative positioning (as Wayland does), so I've added a Relative
>> positioning on `InputMethodRequest`.
>>
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 21:08:41 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> A `SECURITY.md` file was recently added to the jdk repo. GitHub will show
> that policy if you click on the ["Security"
> tab](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/security) of the jdk repo -- If you are
> logged in, you may need to further
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:48:16 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Requirement:
>> We want to be able to test a JavaFX SDK built somewhere else other than on
>> current machine or current repo on same machine. Which means we should be
>> able to run the unit and system tests with a different JavaF
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 01:45:14 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
> Restored some behavior in genVSproperties that enabled ARM builds and
> cross-compilation on Windows. Verified that I can build on ARM but have no
> way of testing other architectures.
The change looks good to me, and I see a successful GHA
Hi,
I'm investigating the code, and for someone not familiar with it, it's very
complex.
On com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.WindowStage it will do this when changing
scene:
if (oldScene != null) {
ViewPainter painter = ((ViewScene)oldScene).getPainter();
QuantumRenderer.getInstance().disposePr
Fixing the wrong TriangleMesh.vertexFormat property.
TriangleMesh.getVertexFormat() and TriangleMesh.vertexProperty().get()
initially returned different values, which are now fixed.
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8341010
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1581/files
Webrev: htt
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 01:45:14 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
> Restored some behavior in genVSproperties that enabled ARM builds and
> cross-compilation on Windows. Verified that I can build on ARM but have no
> way of testing other architectures.
The change looks good to me. I've done a build on our b
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 01:45:14 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
> Restored some behavior in genVSproperties that enabled ARM builds and
> cross-compilation on Windows. Verified that I can build on ARM but have no
> way of testing other architectures.
Thanks for this.
@tiainen can you review?
Thanks, and thank you Martin for filing the issue
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340982. I'll try to create an account
on openjdk.org to be able to watch the issue :-).
Tangentially:
For some reason mails on the openjfx-dev mailinglist coming from
mar...@martinfox.com are not coming through
25 matches
Mail list logo
