On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 00:10:50 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
>> When a window is visible the maximized, iconified, and fullscreen properties
>> are two-way streets; changes made in Java are sent on to the platform window
>> and changes in the platform window are sent back into Java.
>>
>> When a window
> When a window is visible the maximized, iconified, and fullscreen properties
> are two-way streets; changes made in Java are sent on to the platform window
> and changes in the platform window are sent back into Java.
>
> When a window is hidden these properties (and others, like location and
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 07:01:51 GMT, Karthik P K wrote:
>> The text run selected in `PrismTextLayout::getHitInfo()` method for
>> character index calculation was not correct when hitTest was invoked for
>> Text node in a TextFlow with more than one Text child. Hence wrong character
>> index value
Hi list,
I've made a proof of concept for possibly exposing Behaviors as a first
class API in JavaFX. It's by no means complete, and there will be some
significant hurdles still no doubt, but this proof of concept does
replace the internal ButtonBehavior completely with a newly implemented
p
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:29:03 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
> Clean backport of JDK-8317508.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 5958b044
Author:Alexander Matveev
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/commit/5958b044064127c92e0776a741f4341931e3ac23
Stats: 12 line
Clean backport of JDK-8317508.
-
Commit messages:
- Backport de456dad193f295a8bd93b72bb9b71960e6afd18
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/21/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=21&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317508
Stats:
Hi,
I have some questions on prism es2.
1) Why is a Context created on each platform GLFactory if there is a
GLContext?
2) What is the use of the Dummy Window?
I'm working on using EGL instead of GLX, so it will work on Wayland.
Thanks.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:51:52 GMT, vlaaad wrote:
> This PR addresses [JDK-8284445](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284445).
>
> Context: the warning might be more important than it seems. Our JavaFX-based
> desktop app has [an issue](https://github.com/defold/defold/issues/7845) —
> when th
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:51:52 GMT, vlaaad wrote:
> This PR addresses [JDK-8284445](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284445).
>
> Context: the warning might be more important than it seems. Our JavaFX-based
> desktop app has [an issue](https://github.com/defold/defold/issues/7845) —
> when th
John,
>>
>> You’re proposing using a similar mechanism to enable behaviors to
>> communicate with their controls. That seems like a different problem that
>> deserves a different discussion. In particular I don’t think these two
>> problems need to be solved at the same time even if they both
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 13:06:49 GMT, vlaaad wrote:
>> This PR addresses [JDK-8284445](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284445).
>>
>> Context: the warning might be more important than it seems. Our JavaFX-based
>> desktop app has [an issue](https://github.com/defold/defold/issues/7845) —
>> w
This PR addresses [JDK-8284445](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284445).
Context: the warning might be more important than it seems. Our JavaFX-based
desktop app has [an issue](https://github.com/defold/defold/issues/7845) — when
the user opens 2 instances of the app, one of the instances h
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:51:52 GMT, vlaaad wrote:
> This PR addresses [JDK-8284445](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284445).
>
> Context: the warning might be more important than it seems. Our JavaFX-based
> desktop app has [an issue](https://github.com/defold/defold/issues/7845) —
> when th
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 03:26:51 GMT, Sai Pradeep Dandem wrote:
>> modules/javafx.graphics/src/test/java/test/javafx/scene/Node_lookup_Test.java
>> line 202:
>>
>>> 200: */
>>> 201: @Test
>>> 202: public void lookupPseudoTest3() {
>>
>> Consider naming the test methods according to wh
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 07:12:03 GMT, Marius Hanl wrote:
> Sure, but why?
The first column in tree table is different from subsequent columns. I just
want to make sure it works there as well.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1197#issuecomment-1772845089
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:32:37 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> Sai Pradeep Dandem has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8185831: Fixed test failing issues and code review comments
>
> This looks more reasonable now.
I agree with @h
On 18/10/2023 22:49, Andy Goryachev wrote:
Dear John, thank you for clarifications. Sorry for my delayed response.
I think we need more meat for question #1 - it is not yet clear. All
event handlers end up in the control’s list, and we know that the
ordering may be undetermined (or, rather
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 12:40:58 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
> Set minimum python version for all platforms.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 8c2c9ca4
Author:Hima Bindu Meda
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/commit/8c2c9ca4ca6bb72e5fbe97d002757d267b7c0882
Stats:
Set minimum python version for all platforms.
-
Commit messages:
- Backport bb07bcf7eb60cb772e6d4f135893ff6915c5aa0d
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/20/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=20&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-83
Hi Martin, I missed your initial mail again somehow; I will look into
what's going with my mailing list setup, but I'll respond here inline.
On 18/10/2023 22:20, Andy Goryachev wrote:
I wonder if this might encroach upon application-specific
requirements/logic (that is, does not belong to the
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 03:28:08 GMT, Sai Pradeep Dandem wrote:
>> **Issue:**
>> Using pseudo classes in programmatic query using Node.lookupAll() or
>> Node.lookup() gives unexpected results.
>>
>> **Cause:**
>> There is no check for checking the psuedo states matching in the applies()
>> method
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:12:02 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
> Also, would it be possible to extend the tree table view test to include a
> second column with the same logic?
Sure, but why?
I mean, a test should usually consist of as few components as are needed for
testing, since we want to test
22 matches
Mail list logo
