On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:33:31 GMT, Karthik P K wrote:
> When a large number of items were scrolled in the `ChoiceBox`, the scrolled
> offset was carried forward when the list is replaced with small number of
> items. Hence the scroll up arrow was displayed with empty popup.
>
> Changed code to
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 14:19:15 GMT, Karthik P K wrote:
>> modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/scene/control/ContextMenuContent.java
>> line 827:
>>
>>> 825:
>>> 826: boolean isDownArrowVisible() {
>>> 827: return upArrow.isVisible();
>>
>> Just to double-check, shou
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:56:58 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> Accessibility client applications like Windows Narrator and JAWS read
> positions of the items in a ListView/ComboBox as "index of total-item-count".
> For example, in an ComboBox with 10 items, first item "Item1" would be read
> as "Ite
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:56:58 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> Accessibility client applications like Windows Narrator and JAWS read
> positions of the items in a ListView/ComboBox as "index of total-item-count".
> For example, in an ComboBox with 10 items, first item "Item1" would be read
> as "Ite
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:37:51 GMT, Lukasz Kostyra wrote:
>> When a large number of items were scrolled in the `ChoiceBox`, the scrolled
>> offset was carried forward when the list is replaced with small number of
>> items. Hence the scroll up arrow was displayed with empty popup.
>>
>> Changed
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:56:58 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> Accessibility client applications like Windows Narrator and JAWS read
> positions of the items in a ListView/ComboBox as "index of total-item-count".
> For example, in an ComboBox with 10 items, first item "Item1" would be read
> as "Ite
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:33:31 GMT, Karthik P K wrote:
> When a large number of items were scrolled in the `ChoiceBox`, the scrolled
> offset was carried forward when the list is replaced with small number of
> items. Hence the scroll up arrow was displayed with empty popup.
>
> Changed code to
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 03:19:55 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao
wrote:
>> This cleans size and positioning code, reducing special cases, code
>> complexity and size.
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> - cached extents: 28, 1, 1, 1 are old defaults - modern gnome uses different
>> sizes. It does not assume any si
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:57:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> In support of the JBS version change from "openjfxNN[.0.MM]" to
> "jfxNN[.0.MM]", we need to update the JBS version in .jcheck/conf in each
> active code line.
>
> The planned cut-over date is Tuesday, Feb 28. I will integrate this PR
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:57:22 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> In support of the JBS version change from "openjfxNN[.0.MM]" to
> "jfxNN[.0.MM]", we need to update the JBS version in .jcheck/conf in each
> active code line.
>
> The planned cut-over date is Tuesday, Feb 28. I will integrate this PR
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:59:47 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> In support of the JBS version change from "openjfxNN[.0.MM]" to
> "jfxNN[.0.MM]", we need to update the JBS version in .jcheck/conf in each
> active code line.
>
> The planned cut-over date is Tuesday, Feb 28. I will integrate this PR
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:56:57 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> In support of the JBS version change from "openjfxNN[.0.MM]" to
> "jfxNN[.0.MM]", we need to update the JBS version in .jcheck/conf in each
> active code line.
>
> The planned cut-over date is Tuesday, Feb 28. I will integrate this PR
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:29:26 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
> Stabilization fixes from Webkitgtk-2.38.5.
> Verified drt and unit tests. No issues observed.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 67c2b7a1
Author:Hima Bindu Meda
Committer: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git
When a large number of items were scrolled in the `ChoiceBox`, the scrolled
offset was carried forward when the list is replaced with small number of
items. Hence the scroll up arrow was displayed with empty popup.
Changed code to scroll to top before popup display when content height of
`Choic
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:29:26 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
> Stabilization fixes from Webkitgtk-2.38.5.
> Verified drt and unit tests. No issues observed.
Building and testing completed without issues.
-
Marked as reviewed by sykora (Author).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/103
Vote: yes
Zitat von Kevin Rushforth :
I hereby nominate Jose Pereda [1] to OpenJFX Reviewer.
Jose is an OpenJFX community member, who has contributed 59 commits
[2][3] to OpenJFX.
Votes are due by March 2, 2023 at 23:59 UTC.
Only current OpenJFX Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:12:29 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
> Split off from https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/837
>
> This uses a precompiled regex pattern and cleans up the code in
> WebColorFieldSkin a bit.
This looks good!
-
Marked as reviewed by aghaisas (Reviewer).
PR: https:
Vote: Yes
On 17/02/2023 00:24, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
I hereby nominate Jose Pereda [1] to OpenJFX Reviewer.
Jose is an OpenJFX community member, who has contributed 59 commits
[2][3] to OpenJFX.
Votes are due by March 2, 2023 at 23:59 UTC.
Only current OpenJFX Reviewers [4] are eligible to
Vote : YES
Regards,
Ajit
> On 17-Feb-2023, at 4:54 AM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Jose Pereda [1] to OpenJFX Reviewer.
>
> Jose is an OpenJFX community member, who has contributed 59 commits [2][3] to
> OpenJFX.
>
> Votes are due by March 2, 2023 at 23:59 UTC.
>
> Only
Vote: Yes
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:25 AM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jose Pereda [1] to OpenJFX Reviewer.
>
> Jose is an OpenJFX community member, who has contributed 59 commits
> [2][3] to OpenJFX.
>
> Votes are due by March 2, 2023 at 23:59 UTC.
>
> Only current OpenJFX Review
Vote: Yes
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023, 04:54 Philip Race wrote:
> Vote: yes
>
> -phil
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
