delivered and maintained for the sake of backward compatibility (but >
only when running a 64-bit kernel).
which is well and good --- but then why are 32-bit libraries being
slowly excised? Especially libraries which are needed by illumos-gate?
--
On 1/6/24 13:01, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 06:17:58AM -0600, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Having updated my OI workstation after quite some time, I find myself with
quite a bit of breakage surrounding missing 32-bit libraries. For example,
libcurl and libcairo (among others) are
ger align with my own.
-- Matthew R. Trower
On 1/7/24 04:28, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 06:33:42PM -0600, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
mtrower@saturn:~$ conky
ld.so.1: conky: fatal: libcurl.so.4: open failed: No such file or directory
Killed
There are several types of softwa
e workload is, what I can
help with, and whether that help would be enough to make a difference.
To further discuss this, is mail the best medium or would it be better
for me to show up to a meeting? If a meeting is best, could you please
give a time and venue
.
-- Matthew R. Trower
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
0.0
===
Am I correct in observing, that the only remaining packages depending on
our Motif will be developer/opensolaris/X and x11/keyboard/accessx? I
would think those could easily be updated to work with the new code.
I'd be curious to know if anyone is using th
r running programs built against the Solaris libraries.
Yeah, that's the sticking point. I wonder if there are people out there
still running things like that.
-- Matthew R. Trower
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discus
However, I suspect
the only way you're going to get a real answer on that is to run your
own tests.
-- Matthew R. Trower
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
e. It's just idle speculation
on my part, don't worry about it.
-- Matthew R. Trower
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
of /var/pkg/lost+found? Can any files I
discover in there be safely deleted?
-- Matthew R. Trower
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On 1/12/24 03:19, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:16:21PM -0600, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Is the format of /var/pkg/publisher committed at this point? It looks to
contain cached data and downloads from publishers, which ought not to be
tied to any particular BE. If I create a
On 1/12/24 04:41, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:08:12AM -0600, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
/var/pkg/publisher is exactly what I thought it was. I am still
not clear as to whether the format is committed(stable) across
different versions of pkg5, and therefore safe to share
On 1/12/24 08:49, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 08:21:17AM -0600, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
On 1/12/24 04:41, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:08:12AM -0600, Matthew R. Trower
wrote:
/var/pkg/publisher is exactly what I thought it was. I am
still not clear as
Hi Till,
To clarify, I only wish to share /var/pkg/publisher. /var/pkg clearly
contains image-specific data, and bad bad things would happen if that
were shared.
Does your statement still apply specifically to /var/pkg/publisher?
-- Matthew R. Trower
On 1/12/24 12:25, Till Wegmueller
__
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Ah! Thank you. And Thank you for the material to read. I'll look into
this.
-- Matthew R. Trower
__
.
-- Matthew R. Trower
> On Jan 13, 2024, at 05:42, Till Wegmueller wrote:
>
> Hi Mathew
>
> It is a special statement for /var/pkg/publisher you will get stale data due
> to how the Metadata download process works. This directory MUST always go
> forward in time
ustrated than
me when pkg pegs a core on my T5240 for 10 straight minutes, while the
other 127 cores sit idle...
I imagine I'll end up having to look at this sooner rather than later,
as pkg is central to a lot of the work I'm trying to do right now.
-- Matthew R. Trower
___
daemon
if you find such a process maybe you can find out what is launching
it with the command "ptree"
- if this is a single user machine and you never want locking, maybe
just uninstall desktop/xscreensaver?
-- Matthew R. Trower
___
ope
I don’t suppose you have the capability to boot via cdrom? I’ve had similar
sorts of trouble booting from USB images on some machines.
-- Matthew R. Trower
> On Jan 20, 2024, at 03:32, open wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Lenovo P1 Gen 6 intel core i7. I am currently running
R and
report back when I have something to show.
-- Matthew R. Trower
On 1/22/24 12:15, Marcel Telka wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 05:26:22PM -0600, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
I'll have a look at getting JEdit, dwdiff, ROXTerm and pen packaged up.
iozone is not GPL, but I can
ging the others. Just as a
sanity check, that I've followed the process correctly.
Hopefully I have enough kinks works out now that future packaging is
easier/quicker.
-- Matthew R. Trower
On 1/24/24 19:06, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Hi Marcel,
I had begun looking into this, but got sid
Hi Marcel,
Yes, I do plan to continue. Due to an unusual work schedule, my available time
comes and goes in cycles at the moment. The next cycle is starting soon.
-- Matthew R. Trower
> On Feb 13, 2024, at 17:07, Marcel Telka wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
>> On Wed, Jan 31,
clearly.
I could have a look when I have time, and see if I still have that branch
around, or if it’s otherwise possible to identify what I’m actually using.
-- Matthew R. Trower
> On Aug 12, 2024, at 08:10, Ignacio Soriano Hernandez via openindiana-discuss
> wrote:
>
> Ja, the fina
23 matches
Mail list logo
