Well, for me it is mistake to mix up technology with politics. I respects
the right of having opinion (everybody has it right?) but I strongly belive
that it should be separate from technology blog where expectation was to
find technical data about the distro..
Well, if you decide to drop the proj
Le 2014/09/14 17:26 +0200, Jim Klimov a écrit:
while i don't have a precise answer, i think that the set of valid
characters in dataset names is different from those in the POSIX
filesystems - i.e. '@' and '%' are reserved dataset separators (real
and receiving-in-progress snapshots) while valid
Hi Martin,
as much as I have appreciated your work in the past years (I have even
donated a bit although I do not use OpenSXCE as a proof of sympathy), I
think your way of antagonizing is somewhat counterproductive.
To be honest, I think OpenSXCE is an impressive one-man project effort,
that you s
Hi Aurelien,
ok, I re-subscribed again in order to respond.
I think you need to be reminded of some facts.
"> Had you become the leader of the OpenIndiana SPARC port instead
of running OpenSXCE alone, maybe your work would have become the
reference SPARC distribution and got more recognitio
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your detailed answer.
I am actually aware of the different messages you are refering to, and as I
mentioned earlier, one can understand your frustration.
There is no OI leader anymore and the timing to announce the resignation
might have been unfortunate for you: I do not
In weeks and months and YEARS nobody ever came who bought it from me.
That is, you blame evil users in your commercial fail. They all
conspired. Maybe in reality there is no demand for your product?
Give me everything you got
paid for your job from 2006 till 2014. NOW!
What is this? A rob
I think at this point discussion of OpenSXCE business plans, criticism of
the OpenSXCE community development, political discussions, and pretty much
any discussion of OpenSXCE (except in the context of features that would
be worth re-engineering for OpenIndiana) would all count as off-topic for
thi
@Dmitry Kozhinov: You appear to be slightly confused.
Such "community" members like you make it easy for me to stop my efforts.
If you still didn't get it, or if you are new to Solaris: Everybody
who ever saw my CV (or who is a true OpenSolaris community member and
knows me for a decade) knows, tha
For the LAST TIME: Leave me alone with Fucking "Business Plans"
So far every idiot could download it for free. Now I was forced to
stop these downloads, because of licensing "advice".
Honest fair friends donated, the others just took it (500GB in August
alone, as my USA friend Al Hopper warned me
I need a current modern walk thru of what it takes to setup nfs
serving, so that the clients' users are able to access rw and run
scripts or binaries.
First a quite description of the situation:
First and formost I am a terrrible green horn. I've rarely used nfs.
And never with solaris as server
Hi Harry,
It's possible you have somehow mounted the filesystem locally with
noexec (unlikely, but you can check with "mount | grep /projects/dv" and
make sure noexec is not in the options).
But at a guess, it's more likely you may have the wrong username mapping
since NFSv4 may need config
On 16/09/14 04:51, Dave Pooser wrote:
I think at this point discussion of OpenSXCE business plans, criticism of
the OpenSXCE community development, political discussions, and pretty much
any discussion of OpenSXCE (except in the context of features that would
be worth re-engineering for OpenIndi
#0.) You want to stop something by continuing it?
#1.) What's _YOUR_ contribution to OpenSolaris, be specific?
#2.) Ok, I got it. OI _really_ does not want to get any src from me.
Then those responsible for alienating me should provide a worthy
replacement by hacking OpenSXCE's functionality into
13 matches
Mail list logo
