Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-14 Thread John McEntee
>> You had me worried then an doubt my own sanity. I just remove the 2 drives >> and re-added them. > >Well, no intend to worry people. But in this case I think it's better to look >a bit closer. Again: are you sure the 2 drives where really removed when you >told them to? What did you do to rem

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Simple zfs vs zpool space question.

2014-04-14 Thread John Ryan
On 13/04/2014 3:13 PM, Jim Klimov wrote: On 2014-04-13 01:33, John Ryan wrote: I had a problem once where I was unable to import a pool with a missing log disk. I was unable to recover the pool. Now I mirror the logs How long ago was that (or, rather, with how old a ZFS version)? There was th

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox 28 on Hipster

2014-04-14 Thread Thorsten Heit
Hi, recently I did a fresh install of OI Hipster in VMware Fusion on my Mac by using the latest ISO image available at http://dlc.openindiana.org/isos/hipster/, applied all updates via "pkg image-update -v" and added a few additional packages. So far, a quite plain vanilla installation. Becau

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox 28 on Hipster

2014-04-14 Thread Thorsten Heit
Hi, just after I posted my mail I discovered that FF28 obviously shows the same (mis-)behaviour as was discussed a few weeks ago in the thread "Firefox can't save files" ( http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2014-March/015308.html ): Downloading the source code of Git 1.9.0 res

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox 28 on Hipster

2014-04-14 Thread Jonathan Adams
any particular reason for using 28, rather than the most recent ESR? https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-esr/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/ 24.4 seems to work happily for me ... Jon On 14 April 2014 15:46, Thorsten Heit wrote: > Hi, > > recently I did a fresh install of

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox 28 on Hipster

2014-04-14 Thread Thorsten Heit
> any particular reason for using 28, rather than the most recent ESR? It's newer? :-) *scnr* > https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-esr/ > contrib/solaris_pkgadd/ > > 24.4 seems to work happily for me ... Yes, I saw that in the mailing list archive. Tried that just

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox 28 on Hipster

2014-04-14 Thread Jonathan Adams
writing messages to this list seems to (at least temporarily) fix the problem being reported in Firefox ... I think it reads the messages and subtly alters it's usage ;-P On 14 April 2014 16:08, Thorsten Heit wrote: > > any particular reason for using 28, rather than the most recent ESR? > > It

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox 28 on Hipster

2014-04-14 Thread Apostolos Syropoulos
> >What puzzles me is that a few minutes ago FF28 didn't want to download the >source code of Git 1.9.0 (empty file), but after I read your mail I was >able to successfully download FF24 as a tarball from within the same FF28 >instance. Very strange... > Since I prefer to have Greek language

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox 28 on Hipster

2014-04-14 Thread Jerry Kemp
On 04/14/14 09:58 AM, Thorsten Heit wrote: Hi, just after I posted my mail I discovered that FF28 obviously shows the same (mis-)behaviour as was discussed a few weeks ago in the thread "Firefox can't save files" ( http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2014-March/015308.html ):

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox 28 on Hipster

2014-04-14 Thread Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator]
On 04/14/14 06:47 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote: What puzzles me is that a few minutes ago FF28 didn't want to download the source code of Git 1.9.0 (empty file), but after I read your mail I was able to successfully download FF24 as a tarball from within the same FF28 instance. Very strange...