Disabling sendmail as a standard would be nicer. Setting up a zone that
complains about a misconfigured sendmail from the first boot on is a real pain
to first users.
Kind regards,
The out-side
Op 10 nov. 2012 om 02:54 heeft Rob Shinn het volgende
geschreven:
> On Nov 9, 2012 8:24 PM, "J
On 2012-11-10 10:22, Roel_D wrote:
Disabling sendmail as a standard would be nicer. Setting up a zone that
complains about a misconfigured sendmail from the first boot on is a real pain
to first users.
That's arguable (backwards incompatible vs. expectations, at least)
and may be solved with
Well, Solaris also used to have rsh and telnet enabled by default. See what
I mean?
On Nov 10, 2012 9:10 AM, "Jim Klimov" wrote:
> On 2012-11-10 10:22, Roel_D wrote:
>
>> Disabling sendmail as a standard would be nicer. Setting up a zone that
>> complains about a misconfigured sendmail from the f
On 2012-11-10 15:27, Rob Shinn wrote:
Well, Solaris also used to have rsh and telnet enabled by default. See what
I mean?
Well, you do have a valid point. I do even agree that a publicly
open sendmail server by default is not needed (not everywhere) :)
However, a working sendmail client for i
I am not able to run OI as a guest in SmartOS/KVM. Are there virtio drivers I
can install to get it to recognize the disks? Are there plans to integrate
official drivers into upstream?
Thanks,
Anil
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-dis
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Rob Shinn wrote:
On Nov 9, 2012 8:24 PM, "Jim Klimov" wrote:
Back in Solaris 8 or so, the bundled sendmail included a default
smart_host definition, so that machines internal to a network
could collect and perhaps relay their messages on one dedicated
SMTP server. For this
