On 04 Sep 2012, at 18:37, wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 17:06:06 +0100, "James Relph"
> wrote:
>
>> This to some extent goes back to something I've been talking about
>> recently. The current version of netatalk (v3) is actually excellent on
>> OI. NetAFP added cross-protocol file locki
One last thing: I bought a Dual 1.5GHz USIV Uniboard for V490 which is
located in Phoenix, but the seller strictly refuses to ship overseas.
Could smb. please help me and have it forwarded to Berlin?
This would be cool. But let's first get the DVD out.
I guess the seller can wait 2 more days. La
I disassembled my 2 V210 servers last year because I thought Sparc was
history.
I only have 4 Ultrasparc IIIi processors and memory that I saved from
disposal.
To bad...
-Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:mark0...@gmail.com]
Sent: woensdag 5 september 2012 9:40
To: openindiana-disc
Hey James!
2012/9/4 James Relph :
>
>> AD issues are going to require someone tenacious, motivated, and a bit
>> masochistic as it's historically been a bit of a moving target.
>
> AD seems reasonably stable these days, and in fact the current Illumos
> strategy works 90% of the way, it's the idm
Our users running Lion have a major access problem with CIFS shares
on an oi_148 machine. The Finder is unable (or unwilling) to open
subdirectories of the share's top level.
The problem seems to be only in the Finder, since other programs
(e.g., Terminal or Pages) can navigate down through the C
> what about using winbind? Works with Netatalk and I guess it will also
> work with Solaris CIFS.
>
> We haven't been able to get supplementary groups working, but I'm
> pretty sure that could be solved, possibly by installing an updated
> winbind from sources.
Hi Frank,
Winbind worked straigh
2012/9/5 James Relph :
>
>> what about using winbind? Works with Netatalk and I guess it will also
>> work with Solaris CIFS.
>>
>> We haven't been able to get supplementary groups working, but I'm
>> pretty sure that could be solved, possibly by installing an updated
>> winbind from sources.
>
> W
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 03:37:16 -0700, Martin Frost wrote:
Our users running Lion have a major access problem with CIFS shares
on an oi_148 machine. The Finder is unable (or unwilling) to open
subdirectories of the share's top level.
The problem seems to be only in the Finder, since other programs
For all your hard work I can do that for you. I was thinking about how
to buy you dinner
On 09/ 4/12 08:22 PM, Мартин Бохниг (Martin Bochnig) wrote:
Hi
ok, today I broke my rule and did login again.
Thanks for your encouraging pn's :)
One update: After 8 years it was about time to g
On Sep 5, 2012, at 2:59 AM, Didier Carlier wrote:
>
> The use case described is handled perfectly by OSX server ($15 these days...).
> It might still be a good idea but don't believe that Mac users are waiting
> for such a NAS without any alternatives…
My iTunes library is pushing 2TB these day
Reginald Beardsley wrote:
> I've cloned the repository but find that the Makefile is expecting state to
> be set in the shell. Where would I find details on what I need to have set
> to compile just the things in
>
> usr/src/cmd/ttymon
>
> Is that possible?
Look for the "bldenv" and "ws" scr
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:40:29 -0700 (PDT), Reginald Beardsley wrote:
I've cloned the repository but find that the Makefile is expecting state to be
set in the shell. Where would I find details on what I need to have set to
compile just the things in
usr/src/cmd/ttymon
Is that possible? I'm re
On 05 Sep 2012, at 14:21, Magnus wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2012, at 2:59 AM, Didier Carlier wrote:
>>
>> The use case described is handled perfectly by OSX server ($15 these
>> days...).
>> It might still be a good idea but don't believe that Mac users are waiting
>> for such a NAS without any al
I'd have to buy a new Mac to get Thunderbolt. It's a new feature that only the
newest Macs have. Most Macs in the field now still don't have that option. Time
will change that, of course.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 5, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Didier Carlier wrote:
>
> On 05 Sep 2012, at 14:21, Mag
Thanks.
--- On Wed, 9/5/12, Yuri Pankov wrote:
> From: Yuri Pankov
> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stty source code
> To: "openindiana-discuss"
> Date: Wednesday, September 5, 2012, 7:57 AM
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:40:29 -0700
> (PDT), Reginald Beardsley wrote:
> > I've cloned the reposit
Hi,
Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't wholesale
replace the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If we don't get
any updates downstream from Oracle we will never get features like ipv6
prefix delegation. This feature is becoming important as some big ISPs
(i.e. C
I find that I am unable to convert a newline returned by a remote host to NL-CR
for display in a terminal window.
So instead of:
ok
ok
ok
I get:
ok
ok
ok
I thought I'd try to find out why. I also found I can't actually set "-onlcr"
w/ stty though I can toggle "olcuc". Some thing
Reginald Beardsley wrote:
> I find that I am unable to convert a newline returned by a remote host to
> NL-CR for display in a terminal window.
>
> So instead of:
>
> ok
> ok
> ok
>
> I get:
>
> ok
>ok
> ok
It's unclear to me what problem you're trying to solve. A "terminal
windo
After upgrading from 151a5 to 151a6, sox stopped working with this error:
$ sox
ld.so.1: sox: fatal: libsox.so.2: open failed: No such file or directory
Killed
I couldn't find libsox.so.2 anywhere, but symlinking libsox.so.1 fixed the
issue for now.
Chad
___
Thanks A lot Jim.
I will note this in case similar incident happens.
BTW, a simple restart, and the system detect as amd64.
I think it is a timing bug on obtaining the string i386 without detecting amd64
first
2012-09-02 18:50, Handojo пишет:
>Hi, >>I had Core i7 2600 with 16 GB of RAM. >>>Af
This is an example of one symptom:
oi%rhb {9} stty -a | egrep opost
opost -olcuc onlcr -ocrnl -onocr -onlret -ofill -ofdel
oi%rhb {10} stty -onlcr
oi%rhb {11} stty -a | egrep opost
opost -olcuc onlcr -ocrnl -onocr -onlret -ofill -ofdel
Notice that stty did *not* toggle onlcr. As noted earlier,
Reginald Beardsley wrote:
> This is an example of one symptom:
>
> oi%rhb {9} stty -a | egrep opost
> opost -olcuc onlcr -ocrnl -onocr -onlret -ofill -ofdel
> oi%rhb {10} stty -onlcr
> oi%rhb {11} stty -a | egrep opost
> opost -olcuc onlcr -ocrnl -onocr -onlret -ofill -ofdel
You're probably bes
Folks,
I got on board the OI boat seriously back in April. I love it. It has
pushed me to learn a lot about Solaris as an OS and certain technologies
(like SAS, SCSI) that probably wouldn't have had a place on the Mac I sold.
I want to work with it and use it in solutions I propose to Vet cli
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't wholesale replace
> the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If we don't get any updates
> downstream from Oracle we will never get features like ipv6 prefix
> delegation.
On 05/09/2012 18:14, Chad Cantwell wrote:
After upgrading from 151a5 to 151a6, sox stopped working with this error:
$ sox
ld.so.1: sox: fatal: libsox.so.2: open failed: No such file or directory
Killed
I couldn't find libsox.so.2 anywhere, but symlinking libsox.so.1 fixed the
issue for now.
C
--- On Wed, 9/5/12, James Carlson wrote:
> From: James Carlson
> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stty source code
> To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"
> Date: Wednesday, September 5, 2012, 1:26 PM
> Reginald Beardsley wrote:
> > This is an example of one symptom:
> >
> > oi%rhb {9} stt
Having established that the stty behavior is a red herring produced by
/bin/tcsh here is a precis of the situation (pwd is /etc):
oi%rhb {180} /app/bin/rcsdiff remote ttydefs
===
RCS file: RCS/remote,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -
Reginald Beardsley wrote:
Having established that the stty behavior is a red herring produced by
/bin/tcsh here is a precis of the situation (pwd is /etc):
oi%rhb {180} /app/bin/rcsdiff remote ttydefs
===
RCS file: RCS/remote,v
re
Hi - Look for some assistance in improving disk access performance on my
OpenIndiana install.
Wanting to upgrade my server based on OpenSolaris and ZFS to 3TB drives, I
upgraded the OS to OpenIndiana 151a.
Performance is terrible over the network as compared to the previous
OpenSolaris i
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Jan Owoc wrote:
I don't think the drive's model number or revision will change with a
system update. I don't know whether it detects sector size or simply
uses ashift=12 always (using 4k data sectors on a 512b drive doesn't
exactly have downsides). Either way it shouldn't req
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gary Gendel wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't wholesale replace
the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If we don't get any updates
downstream from Oracle we will never get features like ipv6 prefix
delegation. This feature is bec
31 matches
Mail list logo
