OH MY GOD
This is to bad to be true.
Do I really read people writing down that they have seen Linux outperform
Solaris?
"I spent over a decade developing big data software, primarily on Solaris. I
have seen workloads that bring a 64-core Solaris box to its knees with
massively multi-threaded, bi
On 08/31/2012 08:31 AM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
> On 31/08/12 01:10 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> On 08/30/12 06:08 PM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
>>> And the "farewell" message (if you can call it that) here:
>>>
>>> http://lwn.net/Articles/514046/
>> http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/2012-August/
On 31/08/12 07:31 PM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
People come and go, that's just a fact of life. The important thing
for OpenIndiana now is to get over it, select a new project lead and
rock on. We are all just as saddened as you are to see Alasdair leave,
but I would hope OpenIndiana was never just
IIRC the NDIS wrapper worked with _some_ broadcom drivers (generally
not the latest versions at all)
you could try finding a specific older driver for the 4313 (look
around the Linux NDIS system, some people used to post "compatible"
drivers)
also I found that some NDIS drivers only worked on 32b
I'd like to contribute ISC 4.2.4 dhcp as a package to OpenIndiana. Using
the following configure options, it compiles and runs the self-tests
cleanly:
CC=cc ./configure --enable-use-sockets --enable-ipv4-pktinfo
--sysconfdir=/etc/inet --sbindir=/usr/lib/inet --bindir=/usr/sbin
--prefix=/usr
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Open Indiana wrote:
> It is a true nightmare that the hard work of a lot of volunteers and the
> people of the old Sun company dies because it has been sucked empty by the
> commercial snakes. How Is it possible that companies can take
> opensource-code, wrap a com
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012, Jan Owoc wrote:
>
> NB: just because you are using a copyleft license still doesn't mean
> the people using your code must work with you; they could create a
> fork and ignore you, only publishing the code as a whole when they
> have a finished product (apparently Android was
2012-08-31 17:04, Gary Gendel wrote:
2) Do I support a 64 and 32 bit installation, or should it just be
32-bit? If it's a combination, how do I resolve the installation
conflicts (bin placement, etc).
Afaik, for libraries, kernel modules, etc. you place 32-bit variants
in base lib path, and 64
People come and go, that's just a fact of life. The important thing for
OpenIndiana now is to get over it, select a new project lead and rock
on. We are all just as saddened as you are to see Alasdair leave, but I
would hope OpenIndiana was never just a single-person job.
The main risk at the m
I'm also sad to hear that* *Alasdair Lumsden has resigned as lead of the
project. I was greatly heartened when Alasdair first announced the project
and have been using OI ever since the early releases on both my personal
laptop and as my new work desktop (my other work desktop is Solaris
10/SPARC)
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
>> People come and go, that's just a fact of life. The important thing for
>> OpenIndiana now is to get over it, select a new project lead and rock
>> on. We are all just as saddened as you are to see Alasdair leave, but I
>> would hope OpenI
On 08/31/2012 09:22 PM, Ron Dawson wrote:
> In my workplace we are still using some SPARC desktop applications on aging
> Sun SPARC workstations and Tadpole laptops. We also utilize Sun Ray
> technology extensively in our training environment. (As an aside, I
> remember talking to Garrett back wh
Now we are talking!
I have been deploying Sun Rays for over 14 years.
It is a perfect solution and it needs rock solide virtualisation to
handle the large numbers of VMs.
ZFS and Comstar features would be great to use.
I am hoping that the next version of Oracle VDI/Sun Ray software
supports So
13 matches
Mail list logo
