On 04/27/11 01:34 PM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
Hi All,
More of an OpenSolaris query originally, as I've always had this
problem, but still have it on oi_147 x86. In certain applications
such as Pidgin and the bundled vncserver,. I have saved my password
(for various chat accounts in the former,
Ok, and update on my progress as I have not fixed it yet.
The domain controller the OpenIndiana server is connected to had problems
with the file replication, I cleared the cache and it fixed that problem.
The occurrence of the CIFS server on OpenIndiana dropped dramatically, but
still exist. I f
2012-06-28 17:57, John McEntee wrote:
What I have noticed is an ulimit -a returns
core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
open files (-n) 256
pipe size(512 bytes,
John McEntee wrote:
> Is the open files going to cause CIFS a problem, 256 seems a bit low, could
> easily hit that limit if it is shared amongst all the users.
"man ulimit" and "man getrlimit" for details. That's a limit on the
number of file descriptors open in any one user process. It has not
Anyone have a clue why? This is on 151a4
dsk@bio1:/# zpool attach home c8t0d0 c8t1d0
cannot attach c8t1d0 to c8t0d0: devices have different sector alignment
c8t1do:
ascii name =
bytes/sector= 512
sectors = 2930277167
accessible sectors = 2930277134
Part TagFlag First Sector
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Kjar wrote:
> Anyone have a clue why? This is on 151a4
>
> dsk@bio1:/# zpool attach home c8t0d0 c8t1d0
> cannot attach c8t1d0 to c8t0d0: devices have different sector alignment
> c8t1do:
>
> ascii name =
[...]
> ascii name =
I had this error when one o
2012-06-28 20:37, Jan Owoc wrote:
I wasn't able to find a solution, so I now have a non-mirrored root
pool. Does anyone know how to override this sector alignment issue?
Apparently, only by creating a new rpool on the 4KB drive
and zfs-sending data to it from the 512b drive. The idea
was discus
This is not good news. I guess i will do the send and move to the newer
disk and get another new disk for that mirrored pool.
On 06/28/12 01:02 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
2012-06-28 20:37, Jan Owoc wrote:
I wasn't able to find a solution, so I now have a non-mirrored root
pool. Does anyone know
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, John McEntee
wrote:
> Ok, and update on my progress as I have not fixed it yet.
> [...]
>
> I also have 2 scripts running every minute via cron (from a linux box). One
> copies a 10 MB file via cifs the other via nfs, neither have been delayed
> for more than 5 sec
I am sure someone has asked this before but I googled for the last hour and
have found nothing but a discussion that didn't provide a answer.
My problem is that I want to run a erlang otp release as a SMF service, now the
monitoring does not work properly, what I discovered from the discussion
I'm running oi_148 as a fileserver, exporting via NFS and the
kernel CIFS service for ZFS.
But Windows users (XP and probably all Windows versions) are unable to
write files from any MS Office applications into the shares from ZFS.
They always get: "Access denied. Contact your administrator." Sa
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Martin Frost wrote:
> I'm running oi_148 as a fileserver, exporting via NFS and the
> kernel CIFS service for ZFS.
>
> But Windows users (XP and probably all Windows versions) are unable to
> write files from any MS Office applications into the shares from ZFS.
> T
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:14:53 -0400
> From: Gordon Ross
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Martin Frost wrote:
> > I'm running oi_148 as a fileserver, exporting via NFS and the
> > kernel CIFS service for ZFS.
> >
> > But Windows users (XP and probably all Windows versions) are una
But wouldn't that prevent normal writes as well?
I had the same issue with server 2008r2 and xp clients. That was an smb2.0
issue. I don't know what version of smb the cifs server on OI uses though.
Can you try with other (non-XP/2003) clients?
On Jun 28, 2012 5:08 PM, "Martin Frost" wrote:
> I
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Martin Frost wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:14:53 -0400
> > From: Gordon Ross
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Martin Frost wrote:
> > > I'm running oi_148 as a fileserver, exporting via NFS and the
> > > kernel CIFS service for ZFS.
> > >
>
Assuming that your subnet mask is 255.255.255.0, this means your two
subnets are separate (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24).
Then accessing 192.168.10.2 and 192.168.10.1 would be on a separate
media (your crossover cable; although a modern switch, not hub, would
also do, since they do point
In my environment I have 3 OI_148's integrated into two different ADs,
with the majority of users being Windows users. They don't see any
issues like this. They are heavy users of cad, design tools like
photoshop/sketchup etc, as well as MS office/libreoffice, ~12TB of data
all up (and 30+sna
The explicit deny would apply to creator/owner if that were the case. Also,
it's not a 1:1 NTFS ACL mapping to the ZFS ACL. IIRC, the permissions all
show up as special permissions, for only one or two generic users.
If Windows thought that there was an explicit deny, it wouldn't open the
file, an
18 matches
Mail list logo
