Northwoods wrote:
> After getting acqwainted with oi reps I found no trace of any DE but gnome. I
> also could not find no openbox or any other light wm. No libreoffice and some
> other alternative apps. Seems like all is a work in progress. But why does
> my gnome desktop is still noticably sl
On Apr 29, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Gordon Ross wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Richard Elling
> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2012, at 11:45 AM, George Wilson wrote:
> [...]
>>>
>>> Speaking of 4K sectors, I've taken a slightly different approach that fixes
>>> this outside of ZFS. The idea is t
Hi all
I know this question isn't strictly an openindiana question, but I want to give
it a shot…
I have a few servers with some 300 drives in total with Icinga (a Nagios fork)
monitoring the zpool and smartctl health. It sometimes happens that smartctl
reports a bad drive, and it's replaced.
I've run across this before. What generally happens is a sector will
become unreadable/failed and get reported by smartctl. If the file
system is active and the file using that sector is updated/over written,
the drive will reallocate the sector and fall off as a problem within
SMART. The thing
I'm building a storage server with Dell MD1000 DAS and I just bought 30
drives with 4K sectors.
One of the reasons I selected the "new" 4K sector is so I can easily find
replacement drives 2-3 years from now when they start failing. Looks like
this was a huge mistake.
I'm fine if the drives repor
Are you sure? I thought SMART usually reports failure only after a few
hundred/thousands sectors have failed and spare sectors are running short…
roy
- Opprinnelig melding -
> I've run across this before. What generally happens is a sector will
> become unreadable/failed and get reported
On "complete drive failure", you are probably correct but SMART has
layers. There is a overall PASS/FAIL status which generally reads:
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
See vendor-specific Attribute list for marginal Attributes.
If
I'm trying to compile Mosh ( http://mosh.mit.edu/ ) for OI, but I'm running
into problems with ncurses while running configure. When running configure,
I receive the error that libtinfo or libncurses were not found. Checking
config.log I see the following:
configure:7005: checking for TINFO
config
somewhat it does, and again, not.
The error rate on the disk has the same numbers as earlier, but now health is
reported as good, as in FAILING NOW a few hours ago
- Opprinnelig melding -
> On "complete drive failure", you are probably correct but SMART has
> layers. There is a overall
I'm no professional when it comes to compiling, but I normally set
PKG_CONFIG_PATH by hand with "export
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig" (do set your
proper paths), as well as LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib:/lib. I
have also set the system library paths with crl
Honestly, I think including this, I'm still on single digits with what I've
had to compile from source, and definitely the only thing that I've ever
had to figure out, so you not being a professional is still leaps and
bounds ahead of me.
I'm using gcc installed via "pkg install gcc", which I assu
On 1/05/12 09:08 AM, Robbie Crash wrote:
Honestly, I think including this, I'm still on single digits with what I've
had to compile from source, and definitely the only thing that I've ever
had to figure out, so you not being a professional is still leaps and
bounds ahead of me.
I'm using gcc i
12 matches
Mail list logo
