> Sadly while Nokia seems to want gld/gas, the GCC docs specifically
> recommend using the Sun linker (ld) and the GNU assembler (gas):
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#ix86-x-solaris210
>
> So a system-wide gcc should probably follow the GCC docs.
>
Well to continue the story afte
Yes. There are two developers (one from Oracle) I've noted working on building
LibreOffice 3.3.2.2 and one guy supplied patches. He hit a roadblock though
last I checked which he resolved with the latest stable version (and his
patches). I think there actually was a pending issue though he was t
Hi can someone recommend a compatible SATA port multiplier?
I've got a 4 port SATA PCI (yes plain old 32 bit PCI) RAID controller in
JBOD mode for the shared data, and two on board SATA connectors for the
rpool. I'd like to add a small SSD to speed up some of my pools a bit,
but have no ports lef
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Ray Arachelian wrote:
> Hi can someone recommend a compatible SATA port multiplier?
>
> I've got a 4 port SATA PCI (yes plain old 32 bit PCI) RAID controller in
> JBOD mode for the shared data, and two on board SATA connectors for the
> rpool. I'd like to add a s
On 05/25/2011 12:18 PM, Albert Lee wrote:
>
> Only the ahci driver supports port multipliers to my knowledge.
> There's a generic port multiplier specification so the choice of
> multiplier should not matter (although mostly Silicon Image chips have
> been tested).
>
Hmm, too bad. I don't see
On May 25, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Ray Arachelian wrote:
> I suppose I could give up one of the rpool drives and put it in an USB
> enclosure instead. I guess it'll be an interesting tradeoff.
You might also see if your motherboard has an internal USB port and use a
small, fast flash drive instead. J
On 05/25/2011 01:13 PM, Gary Driggs wrote:
> On May 25, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Ray Arachelian wrote:
>
>> I suppose I could give up one of the rpool drives and put it in an USB
>> enclosure instead. I guess it'll be an interesting tradeoff.
>>
> You might also see if your motherboard has an in
On 05/25/11 06:48 PM, Ray Arachelian wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 12:18 PM, Albert Lee wrote:
>>
>> Only the ahci driver supports port multipliers to my knowledge.
>> There's a generic port multiplier specification so the choice of
>> multiplier should not matter (although mostly Silicon Image chips have
Hi all
I have a few servers running openindiana 148, and it's been running rather well
for some time. Lately, however, we've seen some hichups that may be related to
the platform, rather than the hardware. The actual errors have been variable.
Some issues were due to some supermicro backplanes
I'm having trouble figuring out how to hotswap dead drives on a potential
fileserver I am building. I'm using an LSI Internal SATA/SAS 9211-8i &
9211-4i to connect 12 SATA drives on a Supermicro backplane that supports
SES-2. I am finding conflicting information as to whether OpenIndiana can
ligh
On 26/05/2011, at 3:26 AM, Ray Arachelian wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 01:13 PM, Gary Driggs wrote:
>> On May 25, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Ray Arachelian wrote:
>>
>>> I suppose I could give up one of the rpool drives and put it in an USB
>>> enclosure instead. I guess it'll be an interesting tradeoff.
>>>
This gives me some pause as I'm in the process of replacing Nexenta boxes that
also had flakey reliability. Is anyone using 148 in an enterprise situation
with Supermicro?
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a few servers running openindiana
> > I have a few servers running openindiana 148, and it's been running
> > rather well for some time. Lately, however, we've seen some hichups
> > that may be related to the platform, rather than the hardware. The
> > actual errors have been variable. Some issues were due to some
> > supermicro ba
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Matt Connolly wrote:
> And, if you do find a miniPCIe SSD, please do share, I'd be interested in
> this too.
OCZ has end-of-lifed theirs but you can still find them. Intel and
RiDATA still make them, however, and some searching turned up a few
vendors I haven't h
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Pete Ashdown wrote:
> This gives me some pause as I'm in the process of replacing Nexenta boxes that
> also had flakey reliability. Is anyone using 148 in an enterprise situation
> with Supermicro?
Not sure what means "enterprise" in this case, but if you asking
On 05/25/2011 04:33 PM, BM wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Pete Ashdown wrote:
>> This gives me some pause as I'm in the process of replacing Nexenta boxes
>> that
>> also had flakey reliability. Is anyone using 148 in an enterprise situation
>> with Supermicro?
> Not sure what means
Just for curiosity, what controler are you using?
Br
gab
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Pete Ashdown wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 04:33 PM, BM wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Pete Ashdown
> wrote:
> >> This gives me some pause as I'm in the process of replacing Nexenta
> boxes that
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
