I have seen some conflicting emails on other lists that seem to say "do
not use openindiana, please use based on snv_160!"
What gives? Are they talking about something else altogether, or is
there a useful alternative to openindiana?
___
OpenIndian
> I have seen some conflicting emails on other lists that seem to say
> "do not use openindiana, please use based on snv_160!"
Solaris 11 express is snv_151a, so whoever came up with 160, I don't know.
> What gives? Are they talking about something else altogether, or is
> there a useful alterna
> It seems the physmem option in /etc/system and as given to the kernel
> boot is broken. Booting a system with physmem set to something lower
> than its actual size fails to give any message, and the system has its
> full amount of memory available. Same applies to using kernel options
> (-B physm
Re: "please use based on snv_160"
I would guess that post was from an Oracle employee who has access to
the unreleased (to the public) development versions of what used to be
called OpenSolaris, but is now called Oracle Solaris 11.
snv_160 would be a few internal releases further along than
Hi Alasdair,
I'll soon have a T1000 to send your way. What address shall I ship it to?
kind regards,
Gary
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Gary Driggs wrote:
> Hi Alasdair,
>
> I'll soon have a T1000 to send your way. What address shall I ship it to?
>
> kind regards,
> Gary
>
Just FYI Gary, I've already bought two T1000s (at a considerable
discount off the eBay price), at least one will be dedicated
Thanks for the heads up!
Good to know that there is a - at at least seamingly - working solution for
this.
@Reginald
Yes, that is indeed a bummer. If they had just released a 4k-native firmware
for their drives.
-Original Message-
From: Deano
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11
