I have been running 148 (and 147 before that) as both a zfs nfs file
server on my super-modded ultra20m2 desktop. I also run some pretty
questionable software (virtualbox, crossoveroffice) on my desktop and it
hasn't had a problem. It also ran flawlessly on my big sunfire v40z.
148 has actu
On 5 January 2011 09:53, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> I know I'm biased since I founded OpenIndiana but what you want is
> OpenIndiana build 148.
>
> Although it's a new project and a development release, it's perfectly stable
> - my business runs it on multiple production servers, and I run it on
On 31 Dec 2010, at 00:32, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Hi there
>
> Long time FreeBSD user, I recently used OpenIndiana live CD to recover
> a faulty zpool on which FreeBSD kept crashing.
>
> Was pleasantly surprised on how smooth everything went.
>
> I am now looking at migrating our file server
On 2 Jan 2011, at 12:30, Stephan Budach wrote:
> Am 02.01.11 13:10, schrieb Jean-Yves Avenard:
>> On 2 January 2011 21:42, Chris Ridd wrote:
>>
>>> It is related to nwam, if memory serves. Changing back to network:physical
>>> (I'm away from the box and might have the wrong name, but you get t
Am 02.01.11 13:10, schrieb Jean-Yves Avenard:
On 2 January 2011 21:42, Chris Ridd wrote:
It is related to nwam, if memory serves. Changing back to network:physical (I'm
away from the box and might have the wrong name, but you get the idea) avoided
the problem for me.
Auto-magic indeed...
T
On 2 January 2011 21:42, Chris Ridd wrote:
> It is related to nwam, if memory serves. Changing back to network:physical
> (I'm away from the box and might have the wrong name, but you get the idea)
> avoided the problem for me.
>
> Auto-magic indeed...
The error seems to indicate that /var/lda
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Chris Ridd wrote:
>
> On 2 Jan 2011, at 10:15, Albert Lee wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard
>> wrote:
>>> Then I restarted the box, and I hit that bug:
>>> http://www.illumos.org/issues/487
>>>
>>> e.g. when I restart, ldap fail to init
On 2 Jan 2011, at 10:15, Albert Lee wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
>> Then I restarted the box, and I hit that bug:
>> http://www.illumos.org/issues/487
>>
>> e.g. when I restart, ldap fail to initialise and that box isn't
>> accessible anymore. Have to reboot
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> So I ditched it and install OpenIndiana "stable" 134+ ; after
> navigating through a web page in Russian wanting me to install some
> internet plugins then staring at the screen for almost 5 hours for
> the download to complete . I finall
Hi there.
Well, I spent 24 hours straight on OpenSolaris/OpenIndiana yesterday...
Didn't have much fun let me tell you !
I first tried NexentaStor community edition, using the same kernel
patches as the "stable" openindiana b134... I could see my v28 pool,
then I thought that I had to be mad to
Le 31/12/2010 01:32, Jean-Yves Avenard a écrit :
Salut Jean-Yves,
Depending on what you want to do with your system, Solaris Express 11
could be a good choice:
I use it for a home NAS server for Windows and DCC++, with 6TB ZFS
Raidz2 storage, using 6 1.5 TB disks. Since one cannot be too pru
On 12/30/10 04:32 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> I looked at Solaris Express 11, but one thing in the FAQ worries me
> related to not having access to bug fixes or updates unless I have a
> contract support with Oracle; is this actually the case?
Or unless you wait until the next release. This i
On 1 January 2011 08:51, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> I haven't downloaded, nor do I use nexenta. So I must acknowledge the
> possibility that maybe they have 28 in a development build but not released
> yet... I don't know.
Well, I can confirm that nexenta is v26 only :(
can't find any v28 anyw
> From: Jean-Yves Avenard [mailto:jyaven...@gmail.com]
>
> > zpool 28 is the latest open-source version. Basically your options are
> > nexenta, openindiana, and freebsd.
> > sol11exp has zpool 31
> > nexenta has zpool 28
>
> Are you sure about nexenta ?
This is what I based that
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Hi
>
> thank you for your answer..
> On 1 January 2011 00:06, Edward Ned Harvey
> wrote:
> > zpool 28 is the latest open-source version. Basically your options
> are
> > nexenta, openindiana, and freebsd.
> >sol11exp has zpool 31
> >nexenta has zpool 28
Hi
thank you for your answer..
On 1 January 2011 00:06, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> zpool 28 is the latest open-source version. Basically your options are
> nexenta, openindiana, and freebsd.
> sol11exp has zpool 31
> nexenta has zpool 28
Are you sure about nexenta ?
The only refe
> From: Jean-Yves Avenard [mailto:jyaven...@gmail.com]
>
> I am now looking at migrating our file server from FreeBsd to a
> Solaris based distribution.
If you use any of the oracle-based distros, you cannot have updates except
with support contract. Also, sadly, they eliminated the OEM versions
2010/12/31 Andrey N. Oktyabrski :
> On 12/17/10 01:06, Alexander Sergeev wrote:
>> ==
>> *** OpenIndiana 134+ Stable X86, rev. 11 ***
>> ===
On 31 Dec 2010, at 00:32, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> I looked at Solaris Express 11, but one thing in the FAQ worries me
> related to not having access to bug fixes or updates unless I have a
> contract support with Oracle; is this actually the case?
I have S11 Express at work, no support contra
On 12/31/10 03:32, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Ultimately, what I'm after right now is something stable and
performant, that can read my zpool v28 and supports kernel cifs and
that I will easily be able to integrate with our LDAP / Kerberos
backend.
Why not to use this:
On 12/17/10 01:06, Alexand
Good Questions. I also want to see the clear answers for that :)
I need to take a decision what OS to install on my laptop which will be
used for C development workstation and I am interested of dtrace and
netbeans/sds.
On 31.12.2010 г. 02:32, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi there
Long time Fre
21 matches
Mail list logo
