/11/12 21:06
> De : "Gary"
> A : "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox security
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:57 AM, cpforum wrote:
>
> > However today a browser without Flash has a broken leg.
&g
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:57 AM, cpforum wrote:
> However today a browser without Flash has a broken leg.
>
I and a few hundred thousand Bloons players whole-heartedly agree. ;)
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> Message du 19/11/12 14:25
> De : "bscuk2"
> A : "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox security
>
> The latest Firerfox releases do play HTLM 5 format videos without the
> need for flash per
The latest Firerfox releases do play HTLM 5 format videos without the
need for flash perhaps an argument to keep updated on Firerfox.
On 19/11/2012 12:48, Jonathan Adams wrote:
we're looking at incomplete solutions, have you taken a look at:
https://github.com/mozilla/shumway
On 19 November 2012 00:37, bscuk2 wrote:
> Has anyone considered lightspark as a substitute for flash on Oi?
>
If we're looking at incomplete solutions, have you taken a look at:
https://github.com/mozilla/shumway
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
O
Has anyone considered lightspark as a substitute for flash on Oi?
On 18/11/2012 18:19, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2012-11-18 18:00, cpforum wrote:
Firefox, Java and Thunderbird are very old releases. Gnome Desktop is
not maintened and applications like OpenOffice, Flash, Adobe Reader,
etc. are 2 or
On 2012-11-18 18:00, cpforum wrote:
Firefox, Java and Thunderbird are very old releases. Gnome Desktop is not
maintened and applications like OpenOffice, Flash, Adobe Reader, etc. are 2 or
3 years old with a lot of known security holes.
Speaking of which: some of these projects are opensource
> Message du 17/11/12 19:39
> De : "Bob Friesenhahn"
> A : "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox security
>
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Gary Driggs wrote:
>
> > I see this questi
On Nov 17, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
> Even with x86 binary code, it is possible that the code may be able to
> resolve and invoke a standard C library call (e.g. system()) in a way which
> works on both Solaris and Linux.
The JavaScript I've seen most of lately is designed to
On Nov 17, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
> Even with x86 binary code, it is possible that the code may be able to
> resolve and invoke a standard C library call (e.g. system()) in a way which
> works on both Solaris and Linux.
I've not seen any code that bothers. Most JavaScript la
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Gary Driggs wrote:
I see this question asked regularly... Generally speaking, the vast
majority of browser exploits in the wild target windows browsers or
their plugins like Java, Adobe Reader & Flash, or ActiveX. So even if
you're using one of those plugins with a Unix brow
I see this question asked regularly... Generally speaking, the vast
majority of browser exploits in the wild target windows browsers or
their plugins like Java, Adobe Reader & Flash, or ActiveX. So even if
you're using one of those plugins with a Unix browser (of those
available), you're already pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
