Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-17 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 04:11 AM, Mark wrote: On 14/07/2011 2:44 a.m., Christopher Chan wrote: On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote: Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas? No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver ___

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-14 Thread Mark
On 14/07/2011 8:44 a.m., Gregory Youngblood wrote: On Jul 13, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Mark wrote: On 14/07/2011 2:44 a.m., Christopher Chan wrote: On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote: Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas? No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-13 Thread Gregory Youngblood
On Jul 13, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Mark wrote: > On 14/07/2011 2:44 a.m., Christopher Chan wrote: >> On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote: >>> Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas? >> >> No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver >> > The IT & IR firmware both use the s

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-13 Thread Mark
On 14/07/2011 2:44 a.m., Christopher Chan wrote: On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote: Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas? No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-13 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote: Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas? No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mai

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-13 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote: Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas? No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakkwrote: We're moving to 9211-8i - so far no such problems with those. Exporting and rei

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-13 Thread Eric Pierce
Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas? On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > We're moving to 9211-8i - so far no such problems with those. Exporting and > reimporting the pool shouldn't be a problem. > > roy > > - Original Message - > > Also, would it be

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-12 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
We're moving to 9211-8i - so far no such problems with those. Exporting and reimporting the pool shouldn't be a problem. roy - Original Message - > Also, would it be possible to just export the pool, install the new > HBA, and > re-import the pool or is that asking too much? :) > > On T

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-12 Thread Eric Pierce
Also, would it be possible to just export the pool, install the new HBA, and re-import the pool or is that asking too much? :) On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Eric Pierce wrote: > Is it functionally different if I don't even bother with the raid crap on > it, or should I change the firmware any

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-12 Thread Eric Pierce
Is it functionally different if I don't even bother with the raid crap on it, or should I change the firmware anyway? The LSI controller is built into the motherboard of the supermicro server we have. Do you have a recommendation for a better SAS HBA? On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Roy Sigurd

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-12 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
And by the way, the IR firmware is the 'raid' firmware, supporting mirrors. Better use the IT firmware for ZFS roy - Original Message - > It's an LSI2008-IR. Same thing or different? It's a SAS controller, no > RAID. > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > wrote: > >

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-12 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
I don't know that one. The chipset on 3801/3081 is LSI-1068, and the driver is 'mpt'. I've seen serious issues with those... roy - Original Message - > It's an LSI2008-IR. Same thing or different? It's a SAS controller, no > RAID. > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-10 Thread Eric Pierce
It's an LSI2008-IR. Same thing or different? It's a SAS controller, no RAID. On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > It wouldn't be an LSI 3801/3081 board by any chance? I've seen some rather > bad issues like this with those boards > > roy > > - Original Message -

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-09 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
It wouldn't be an LSI 3801/3081 board by any chance? I've seen some rather bad issues like this with those boards roy - Original Message - > Indeed, right now zpool status -v is reporting only 1 unrecoverable > error. > However, other LUNs aren't recognized by VMWare as VMFS volumes > an

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-08 Thread Eric Pierce
Indeed, right now zpool status -v is reporting only 1 unrecoverable error. However, other LUNs aren't recognized by VMWare as VMFS volumes anymore. The server does have ECC memory, and an LSI SAS controller (no RAID, ZFS handles everything). We've had this in production for about 4 months without

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-08 Thread Lucas Van Tol
ailures on disks in that vdev. Have you had any memory or disk controller issues on the system, and are you using ECC memory? -Lucas Van Tol > Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:05:49 -0400 > From: agtcov...@gmail.com > To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > Subject: [OpenIndiana-disc

[OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-08 Thread Eric Pierce
I'm posting this in hopes someone can help me out. Yesterday, it appears we lost 2-3 drives in our pool. The pool is 22 drives mirrored with 2 hot spares, both of which activated: Here's the current state of the pool: pool: vmstorage state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced