On 11/8/16, 5:18 PM, "Harry Putnam" wrote:
"Hetrick, Joseph P" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would be very aware of the issues with zfs send/recv I have posted
> here and to illumos discuss before performing either activity. If you
> have an OI 151aN series install I would be cautious thinking you c
"Hetrick, Joseph P" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would be very aware of the issues with zfs send/recv I have posted
> here and to illumos discuss before performing either activity. If you
> have an OI 151aN series install I would be cautious thinking you can
> zfs send/receive data between them. We ha
Hi,
I would be very aware of the issues with zfs send/recv I have posted here and
to illumos discuss before performing either activity. If you have an OI 151aN
series install I would be cautious thinking you can zfs send/receive data
between them. We have found that newer hipster/Omni relea
Hi guys,
I can conclude that updating from OI /dev was tested in july/august and it
worked. HOWEVER, those systems had these specifics:
- no zones installed. /dev ipkg vs /hipster ipkg are completely different
types, so upgrading if you have zones is _DANGEROUS_.
- were mostly only base install
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Harry Putnam wrote:
I have another pair of matching mirrored disks with the main data, but
still plenty of room on that setup to send/receive the zfs fs I do
have on the rpool disk.
Then I could just leave those data discs out of the install,
incorporating them after.
I see
Running oi build 151_9 (not hipster)
Hardware:
HP xw8600 workstation with 2x XEON 5460 3.00ghz cpus and 32 GB ram.
My setup is very small beer compared to many on this list. I only
have a few zfs FS carrying data on a mirrored pair of disks that
contains rpool. Maybe about 125 GB
I have anothe
