On 05/25/16 04:53 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
may be incorrect... and so would software written on them.
Even on FreeBSD I have seen _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 assuming c99.
I think Alexander found more of them hardcoded in source files while
testing gcc 5.3...
Yikes. That's not right. Compilation envi
On 05/25/16 12:15 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hi.
It seems illumos/Solaris is the only OS which doesn't have msg_control and
msg_controllen in struct msghdr by default.
For Solaris 11.x & earlier, yes.
Is it because of some standard requirements or just historical artifact? Can we
somehow al
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Jay F. Shachter
wrote:
>
> >
> > Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 10:15:33 +0300
> > From: Alexander Pyhalov
> > Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] struct msghdr and _XPG4_2
> > Message-ID: <57455115.2040...@rsu.ru>
> >
> &
>
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 10:15:33 +0300
> From: Alexander Pyhalov
> Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] struct msghdr and _XPG4_2
> Message-ID: <57455115.2040...@rsu.ru>
>
> Hi.
> It seems illumos/Solaris is the only OS which doesn't have
> msg_control
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:48 PM, James Carlson
wrote:
> On 5/25/2016 9:55 AM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, James Carlson >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It's not terrifically hard to do -- setting -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 on a
> >> compiler compatible with at least c99 and linki
On 5/25/2016 9:55 AM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, James Carlson
> wrote:
>
>> It's not terrifically hard to do -- setting -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 on a
>> compiler compatible with at least c99 and linking with -lxnet should set
>> you up with a SUSv3 environment -- but,
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, James Carlson
wrote:
> On 5/25/2016 4:13 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> > The issue here is that illumos tries to be compatible with I don't know
> > what. So instead of POSIX-complying OS we have an OS which has interface
> > compatible to I don't know what (SunO
On 5/25/2016 4:13 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> The issue here is that illumos tries to be compatible with I don't know
> what. So instead of POSIX-complying OS we have an OS which has interface
> compatible to I don't know what (SunOS 4? something prehistoric?), which
> doesn't work for applicati
On 05/25/2016 11:04, the outsider wrote:
Interesting topic!
A quick search brought me this:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=66013 (but it seems you found it too)
It seems you are bound to XPG4_2...
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/817-4415/sockets-27/index.html
http://linux.die.net/man/2/re
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1034587/how-does-xpg4-2-and-other-defines
-work-on-solaris
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Alexander Pyhalov [mailto:a...@rsu.ru]
Verzonden: woensdag 25 mei 2016 9:16
Aan: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Onderwerp: [OpenIndiana-discuss] struct msghdr
ssion list for OpenIndiana
Onderwerp: [OpenIndiana-discuss] struct msghdr and _XPG4_2
Hi.
It seems illumos/Solaris is the only OS which doesn't have msg_control and
msg_controllen in struct msghdr by default. So, code like this (this time
taken from scrren), fails.
struct sockaddr_un a;
Hi.
It seems illumos/Solaris is the only OS which doesn't have msg_control
and msg_controllen in struct msghdr by default. So, code like this (this
time taken from scrren), fails.
struct sockaddr_un a;
struct msghdr msg;
struct iovec iov;
char control[1024];
len = sizeof(a);
debug
12 matches
Mail list logo
