In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] missing Description field in many...:
On 11/ 4/16 11:50 PM, Richard Lowe wrote:
Description fields are omitted when they would otherwise just duplicate the
summary.
But they could be provided if one is keen to write them as I understand.
Maybe those Des
Hi,
patches and new PRs are always welcome in oi-userland.
Cheers,
Adam
> On 7 Nov 2016, at 08:22, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
>
> Nikola M writes:
>>> On 11/ 4/16 11:50 PM, Richard Lowe wrote:
>>> Description fields are omitted when they would otherwise just duplicate the
>>> summary.
>>
>> But
Nikola M writes:
> On 11/ 4/16 11:50 PM, Richard Lowe wrote:
> > Description fields are omitted when they would otherwise just duplicate the
> > summary.
>
> But they could be provided if one is keen to write them as I understand.
> Maybe those Description fields could be there And duplicate summa
On 11/ 4/16 11:50 PM, Richard Lowe wrote:
> Description fields are omitted when they would otherwise just duplicate the
> summary.
But they could be provided if one is keen to write them as I understand.
Maybe those Description fields could be there And duplicate summary, so
that there is the fiel
Description fields are omitted when they would otherwise just duplicate the
summary.
--
-- Rich
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
All-
I've noticed that a number of IPS packages in both /dev and /hipster
don't have a Description field.
Is that intentional, or is it an accident?
Tim
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing & Infrastructure 701-231-
