Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] dedup status

2010-10-01 Thread Jonathan Adams
On 1 October 2010 11:22, Albert Lee wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Jonathan Adams > wrote: > > Thanks for this, please keep us informed. > > > > We have multiple systems with ZFS raid (3 disks per pool) that are > > snapshot'd and those snapshots are rsynced over the internet and repla

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] dedup status

2010-10-01 Thread Albert Lee
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote: > Thanks for this, please keep us informed. > > We have multiple systems with ZFS raid (3 disks per pool) that are > snapshot'd and those snapshots are rsynced over the internet and replayed > onto a duplicate server in a different location ...

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] dedup status

2010-10-01 Thread Jonathan Adams
Thanks for this, please keep us informed. We have multiple systems with ZFS raid (3 disks per pool) that are snapshot'd and those snapshots are rsynced over the internet and replayed onto a duplicate server in a different location ... currently these servers are on Solaris 10. I would be really i

[OpenIndiana-discuss] dedup status

2010-09-30 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Hi all I just tested dedup on this test box running OpenIndiana (147) storing bacula backups, and did some more testing on some datasets with ISO images. The results show so far that removing 30GB deduped datasets are done in a matter of minutes, which is not the case with 134 (which may take h