On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems
Administrator] wrote:
> On 05/24/14 05:10 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
>
>> I continue to tinker with Tribblix, and a new update (0m10)
>> is now available:
>>
>> http://www.tribblix.org/download.html
>>
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> does you distri
Other notes on Tribblix vs OI:
1. Tribblix is also a 'install-only' DVD and USB option at the moment versus
the 'Live-DVD' option of OI. Also, it has support for automated installs in an
easier fashion than OI.
2. OI is a 'server-centric' distro. Many packages community and/or sponsor
supporte
On 05/24/14 05:10 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
I continue to tinker with Tribblix, and a new update (0m10)
is now available:
http://www.tribblix.org/download.html
There are a couple of features that I've been working on.
One is automated installation (done really simple):
http://tribblix.blogspot.
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:06 AM, cjt wrote:
> On 05/24/2014 10:10 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
>
>> I continue to tinker with Tribblix,
>>
>
> Interesting, but what's the rationale for Tribblix, given the availability
> of OpenIndiana?
>
That is, of course, a fair question.
If you think about the
On Sat, 24 May 2014, cjt wrote:
http://ptribble.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/building-illumos-gate-on-tribblix.html
Interesting, but what's the rationale for Tribblix, given the availability of
OpenIndiana?
Tribblix is officially maintained by Peter Tribble. Who is the
official maintainer of O
On 05/24/2014 10:10 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
I continue to tinker with Tribblix, and a new update (0m10)
is now available:
http://www.tribblix.org/download.html
There are a couple of features that I've been working on.
One is automated installation (done really simple):
http://tribblix.blogspo
I continue to tinker with Tribblix, and a new update (0m10)
is now available:
http://www.tribblix.org/download.html
There are a couple of features that I've been working on.
One is automated installation (done really simple):
http://tribblix.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/cardigan-automated-install-for-
Work continues on putting more flesh on the bare bones that
is Tribblix. The latest update - Milestone 4 - is now available.
http://www.tribblix.org/download.html
The milestone reached here is to build and include OpenJDK,
which opens up a new range of opportunities. (For those who
missed it, one
Ken,
> The Xorg 7.7 packages were built awhile ago. I have a recent update for newer
> Xorg driver builds for Radeon or Intel.
If they've been built, where can they be downloaded from?
Given built software, it's trivially easy for me to bundle it.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.
On Dec 17, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
[...]
> That's mostly correct, but there are other benefits to 64-bit userspace
> programs:
[...]
> - time_t support for dates after 19 January 2038, 2^31 seconds after the
> Unix epoch of 1 January 1970
[...]
Last I recall (Solaris 10 timef
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Alan Coopersmith <
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 12/17/12 03:41 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> > On 2012-12-17 06:59, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> >> Oh, and it assumes no one needs 32-bit binaries any more, since all
> Solaris 11
> >> users have to be running th
Peter
The Xorg 7.7 packages were built awhile ago. I have a recent update for newer
Xorg driver builds for Radeon or Intel.
I've updated the Illumos GCC to 4.4.7 with patches to rebuild the kernel on the
fly and kept userland build intact.
As for the login managers and desktops, its like pick
On 12/17/12 03:41 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On 2012-12-17 06:59, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Oh, and it assumes no one needs 32-bit binaries any more, since all Solaris
>> 11
>> users have to be running the 64-bit kernel since the 32-bit kernel was
>> EOL'ed.
>> (32-bit libraries are still there for
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On 2012-12-17 06:59, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>>
>> Oh, and it assumes no one needs 32-bit binaries any more,
>> [...]
>
> Well, I may probably get corrected (and should, if need be) - but
> in such discussions I've always thought (and heard) th
On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On 2012-12-17 06:59, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Oh, and it assumes no one needs 32-bit binaries any more, since all Solaris
>> 11
>> users have to be running the 64-bit kernel since the 32-bit kernel was
>> EOL'ed.
>> (32-bit libraries are still
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
> On 12/16/12 09:56 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> On 12/16/12 09:42 PM, ken mays wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> I like it. Could you do a milestone build based on Xorg 7.7?
>>>
>>> Maybe: Xorg 7.7
>>> [https://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/ora
On 2012-12-17 06:59, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Oh, and it assumes no one needs 32-bit binaries any more, since all Solaris 11
users have to be running the 64-bit kernel since the 32-bit kernel was EOL'ed.
(32-bit libraries are still there for binary compatibility with other programs,
it's just mo
On 12/16/12 09:56 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 12/16/12 09:42 PM, ken mays wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> I like it. Could you do a milestone build based on Xorg 7.7?
>>
>> Maybe: Xorg 7.7
>> [https://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/oracle/x-cons/x-s11-update-clone/file/c0ba569ea901]
>
> I would not b
On 12/16/12 09:42 PM, ken mays wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I like it. Could you do a milestone build based on Xorg 7.7?
>
> Maybe: Xorg 7.7
> [https://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/oracle/x-cons/x-s11-update-clone/file/c0ba569ea901]
I would not be surprised if that fails to build as-is on illumos/OI-1
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 1:37 PM
Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Tribblix update
Tribblix being a part-time hobby project means that progress tends
to come in fits and starts, but I am moving along.
Milestone 2 of Tribblix is based directly on Illumos. It was based
on Illumos before, of course
Any idea of what the minimum systems requirements will be? Something similar
to a "server" install of OI? Less than the OI desktop?
We have a very old laptop that I'd like to try to eek a few more years of use
out of...
Just curious.
On Dec 16, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Gregory S. Youngblood wrote
Don't know what the current state is but window maker had wdm that used to work
pretty well. Disclaimer, used to maintain it briefly on Linux 10 or so years
ago.
Greg
--
Sent from my Jelly Bean Galaxy Nexus
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>On 12/16/12 11:48 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>>
>> On D
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 16, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I'm still looking for a viable graphical login manager.
>
> If you've pulled the entire X consolidation, then you have xdm for whatever
> that's worth. I've also heard a
On 12/16/12 11:48 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm keeping a keen eye on other lightweight desktops. E17 builds
>> with very little effort, and the full E17 release is just around the
>> corner. It would be nice to have LXDE and aw
On Dec 16, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
[...]
> I'm keeping a keen eye on other lightweight desktops. E17 builds
> with very little effort, and the full E17 release is just around the
> corner. It would be nice to have LXDE and awesome available as
> well. I'm still looking for a viable
Tribblix being a part-time hobby project means that progress tends
to come in fits and starts, but I am moving along.
Milestone 2 of Tribblix is based directly on Illumos. It was based
on Illumos before, of course, but by proxy. Now I'm generating the
packages that come from illumos-gate directly
26 matches
Mail list logo
