Whoops, yes, I thought it was addressed to Peter. Sorry.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, July 04, 2013 10:40 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Off list.
Yeah, we do tend to get things done, but not in a very pretty manner! LOL
My spine is collapsing upon itself. Next month will be eleven years of
continuous nausea, and anywhere from moderate to absol
On Jul 3, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Lou Picciano wrote:
> No worries on this end. In fact, I kinda dug it!
> Do take care of your back, though...!
>
> Lou Picciano
Dug it? Just don't use a jack-hammer.
[];-)
LOL
Thanks, mate.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss ma
]
OpenIndiana server networking problem.
Oops. This wasn't intended for the list, folks.I'm sorry......
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Oops. This wasn't intended for the list, folks.
I'm sorry...
On Jul 3, 2013, at 8:40 PM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Op 3 jul. 2013 om 17:10 heeft "dormitionsk...@hotmail.com"
het volgende geschreven:
>>> Well, I would be that "Cisco manager" -- and everything else here. An
>>> Op 3 jul. 2013 om 17:10 heeft "dormitionsk...@hotmail.com"
>>> het volgende geschreven:
>> Well, I would be that "Cisco manager" -- and everything else here. And you
>> know what they say about us "Jack of All Trades". We're "Masters of None."
>> []:-o Oops... It's sad, but true...
>
On Thursday, July 04, 2013 02:59 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Roel_D wrote:
Did the Cisco manager do a reboot of the router after you switched servers?
If the router had rather long ARP and DHCP caching then it wouldn't give your
OI server new addresses af
On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Roel_D wrote:
> Did the Cisco manager do a reboot of the router after you switched servers?
> If the router had rather long ARP and DHCP caching then it wouldn't give your
> OI server new addresses after switching AND it would route all traffic still
> to the old MA
Did the Cisco manager do a reboot of the router after you switched servers?
If the router had rather long ARP and DHCP caching then it wouldn't give your
OI server new addresses after switching AND it would route all traffic still to
the old MAC addresses.
Thus the network would seem broken, b
On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:14 PM, Michael Schuster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:07 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com <
> dormitionsk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Indeed, I don't know much about networking. I wish I could find a decent
>> book about it. I looked on Amazon.com once, and didn
On 07/02/13 22:27, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On 2013-07-03 01:59, James Carlson wrote:
>> On 7/2/2013 6:11 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>>> properly you'd need to update the /etc/netmasks file with this
>>> entry:
>>>
>>> 69.146.183.56 255.255.255.248
>>
>> /etc/netmasks is so 1980s. I suggest "/24" (CIDR no
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:07 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com <
dormitionsk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Indeed, I don't know much about networking. I wish I could find a decent
> book about it. I looked on Amazon.com once, and didn't find anything I
> thought would be worthwhile. I need to look
On 2013-07-03 01:59, James Carlson wrote:
On 7/2/2013 6:11 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
properly you'd need to update the /etc/netmasks file with this
entry:
69.146.183.56 255.255.255.248
/etc/netmasks is so 1980s. I suggest "/24" (CIDR notation) instead.
It's simpler to use and doesn't have the
On Jul 2, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 07:45 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> I have to call it a day. I appreciate all the help, everyone! I appreciate
>> it very much! Thank you. Peter,
>
> You are almost there Peter. There are now two things
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 08:56 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 09:53 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Wait, what do you mean by "the gateway ip is the same as your nic
address"?
What I meant is that the Gateway
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 07:45 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have to call it a day. I appreciate all the help, everyone! I
appreciate it very much! Thank you. Peter,
You are almost there Peter. There are now two things you can choose
from. 1) Use a dns caching resolver (like Googl
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 09:53 AM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Wait, what do you mean by "the gateway ip is the same as your nic address"?
What I meant is that the Gateway on line three says 192.168.0.4, and that is
also the IP addre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/2/2013 7:45 PM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> On Jul 2, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
>>> I put the following in my /etc/resolv.conf file: nameserver
>>> 69.144.49.30 nameserver 69.146.17.2
>>
>> Of course, if 192.168.0.15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/2/2013 6:21 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On 2013-07-02 23:56, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> Is there a separate DHCP service?
>>
>> svcs -a | grep dhcp
>>
>> did not turn up anything.
Indeed; that's not how it works.
>
> Try to "ps -ef | gr
On 7/2/2013 6:11 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> It seems that the ISP did provide an 8-address block of routable
> IP addresses, so the default /24 netmask assigned to the interface
> is not correct (though it is not quite a problem unless you need
> to contact hosts on other ranges of the subnet). To fix
On Jul 2, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
>> I put the following in my /etc/resolv.conf file:
>> nameserver 69.144.49.30
>> nameserver 69.146.17.2
>
> Of course, if 192.168.0.151 is a stealth local DNS
> slave server (I used such a beast for many years),
> this can work... I can't fi
On 03/07/2013 00:11, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-07-02 23:41, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 02/07/2013 23:56, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
> myad...@tryphon.ds:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> domain ds
> search ds
> nameserver 192.168.0.151
This looks like its correct.
... if the giv
On 2013-07-02 23:56, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is there a separate DHCP service?
svcs -a | grep dhcp
did not turn up anything.
Try to "ps -ef | grep dhcp" for dhcpagent and such. It may be spawned
directly by ifconfig, if if detects being called for a DHCP-enabled
interface. To revis
On 2013-07-02 23:41, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
I created an /etc/hostname.bnx0 file with the following:
69.146.183.59
This should contain your hostname, not the IP !
Be sure to put this 'IP hostname' in /etc/hosts !
This is a good idea, but mostly for manageability (one place to change
th
On 02/07/2013 23:56, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 02/07/2013 23:18, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
svcadm disable svc:/network/physical:nwam
svcadm enable svc:/network/physical:default
That's always a good thing.
I created
On Jul 2, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 23:18, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> svcadm disable svc:/network/physical:nwam
>> svcadm enable svc:/network/physical:default
>
> That's always a good thing.
>
>>
>> I created an /etc/hostname.bnx0 file with the foll
On 02/07/2013 23:18, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
svcadm disable svc:/network/physical:nwam
svcadm enable svc:/network/physical:default
That's always a good thing.
I created an /etc/hostname.bnx0 file with the following:
69.146.183.59
This should contain your hostname, not the IP !
Well, I don't know what just happened, but the /etc/defaultrouter disappeared.
So, I put it back, and rebooted. Now this mostly-stock OI box works. I.e. --
DNS works, and I can ssh into it from outside the network.
I'm hesitant to declare this solved just yet -- until I try this on the (more
On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Timothy Coalson wrote:
> When I set up a static IP and manual DNS server, I just used the GUI, it is
> under the "locations" button on the network preferences dialog that appears
> when you click the network icon in the notification area (or go to
> system->administrati
When I set up a static IP and manual DNS server, I just used the GUI, it is
under the "locations" button on the network preferences dialog that appears
when you click the network icon in the notification area (or go to
system->administration->network). Since you used the GUI to set up the IP
anywa
On 07/02/13 16:16, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
> As you can see, the entries for /etc/resolv.conf are no longer there. (This
> also happened to me before, when I was fighting with this on the other
> machine this past Saturday. I think it has to do with the network manager
> software.)
Indeed, this does look like a DNS problem. I just put the IP Address of our
monastery's website in Firefox in the OI box, and it brought up the site.
So maybe it isn't as bad of a network problem as it looked like yesterday. Or
at least it is better now.
But I still really need help getti
First off, I'd like to thank you all for all the help you've given me. I
really appreciate it. I'd appreciate it if you'd bear with me just a little
bit longer...
I called our ISP, and the tech support person told me that the person who told
me last week that she had reconfigured the modem to
Hello Peter,
I see that this has already been a long thread, and you've tried to
reconfigure and to explain some things in various posts. Can you
outline the logical configuration of what you're trying to build
and what you have as of now? Namely, it is indeed suspicious that
plugging in your OI
Hello Peter,
On 2013-07-01 23:49, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
The /etc/nsswitch.conf is the stock OI configuration. I have not changed
anything in it.
Actually, this may be the culprit for "not seeing hosts in the
internet": the default nsswitch may include only a configuration
for nam
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 07:05:48AM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> On 07/01/13 20:21, Christopher Chan wrote:
> > Wait, what do you mean by "the gateway ip is the same as your nic address"?
>
> He's mistakenly reading the interface route as though it were a
> "gateway" entry.
Here's an example from
On 07/01/13 19:23, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Unless someone can clue me into something that might get things working
> again, my plan for tomorrow is to take a fresh OI server there that only has
> 192.168.0.something, and try it, to see if it can get to the internet. If it
> can, I'm
On 07/01/13 17:49, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
> I thought it was wrong because the gateway was the same as my nic address.
On an interface route, the next hop address is the interface itself. I
think you're staring at the wrong issue.
Drop back to basics. What works? Have you tried usin
On 07/01/13 17:33, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> Is 192.168.0.1 your NAT box (your "router")?
>>
>
> 192.168.0.1 is the cisco router.
>
> 192.168.0.4 is the physical nic of the machine. (theotokos.dsicons.net)
>
> 192.168.0.3 is the "routert3" zone.
OK. That's a start. But that seems
On 07/01/13 20:21, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Wait, what do you mean by "the gateway ip is the same as your nic address"?
He's mistakenly reading the interface route as though it were a
"gateway" entry.
--
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W
___
On Jul 1, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Wait, what do you mean by "the gateway ip is the same as your nic address"?
>
What I meant is that the Gateway on line three says 192.168.0.4, and that is
also the IP address of the nic.
myad...@theotokos.dsicons.net:~# netstat -nr
Routing
Wait, what do you mean by "the gateway ip is the same as your nic address"?
If you cannot ping 8.8.8.8 then you have a routing problem. I don't know
what kind of setup you have got but I'd usually assign Internet
addresses directly to the server and not assign private addresses and
then use ne
On Jul 1, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Marcus Agehall wrote:
>
> Hang on a second. Which vmic is 192.168.0.3? vnic3? If so, I think you are in
> trouble.
>
> I'm struggling to make sense of what you are trying to do here. To me, it
> seems like you are creating a very complicated network setup for someth
On 1 jul 2013, at 23:33, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote:
> Mr. Carlson, I really appreciate your help.
>
> Answers to your question are below.
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:20 PM, James Carlson wrote:
>
>> On 07/01/13 16:45, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> It still canno
And by "I can't see the internet", I cannot ping a known workable host, or
browse the internet.
HTH
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:25 PM, James Carlson wrote:
> On 07/01/13 16:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> Routing Table: IPv4
>> Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
>> - - -- -
>> default
Mr. Carlson, I really appreciate your help.
Answers to your question are below.
On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:20 PM, James Carlson wrote:
> On 07/01/13 16:45, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> It still cannot see the internet.
>
> Is 192.168.0.1 your NAT box (your "router")?
>
192.168.0.1 is the c
On 07/01/13 16:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Routing Table: IPv4
> Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
> - - -- -
> default 192.168.0.1 UG2 7 b
On 07/01/13 16:45, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
> It still cannot see the internet.
Is 192.168.0.1 your NAT box (your "router")?
What does "see" mean in this context? What are you doing? What error
or other messages to you get? What did you expect to have happen?
I'd probably start with
Oops, that broke things!
Now I cannot see either the OI box or the Linux box.
Putting things back now...
On Jul 1, 2013, at 2:45 PM, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
> I put an "/etc/defaultrouter" file with 192.168.0.1 in it, did a "svcadm
> restart network" and now I get this:
>
>
> myad
I put an "/etc/defaultrouter" file with 192.168.0.1 in it, did a "svcadm
restart network" and now I get this:
myad...@theotokos.dsicons.net:~# netstat -nr
Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
--
Well, it looks like we're making some progress. Remember how I said the modem
is assigning our static IP Addresses via DHCP? I had another device plugged
into the modem, and it had assigned the same WAN IP to it that I had assigned
to the router. They had different LAN IP Addresses, but the sa
On 07/01/13 14:31, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On the OI server, if I try to ping someone -- whether it be the router, or an
> outside IP Address, I get the following:
>
> myad...@theotokos.dsicons.net:~# ping -Rvs 70.58.190.52
> PING 70.58.190.52: 56 data bytes
> ICMP Host redirect from
On 07/01/13 14:57, Lucas Van Tol wrote:
> This sounds oddly similar to a 'once upon a time' story I have; where someone
> here was using 'ifconfig' on an opensolaris test box; and used the 'gateway'
> (or is it 'gw'?) option to try and configure the routing in the same command.
> This caused the
nd had it's network configured correctly the next
time around.
-Lucas Van Tol
> From: dormitionsk...@hotmail.com
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:31:10 -0600
> To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana server networking problem.
>
&g
We got internet service set up at a remote location where we want to run an
OpenIndiana 151a7 server. I have a real strange networking problem there,
though.
We have a modem from the ISP that gives us 5 static IP Addresses.
The theory was to have a Cisco router with one-to-one network translat
56 matches
Mail list logo
