On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Rasaki Temidire wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Are there any plans to pull in any of the recent additions from omniOS CE
> illumos work that introduced LX zones and bhyve? If it is already in the
> openIndiana repository, how can I update my current hipster 2018.04
> i
Hello,
Are there any plans to pull in any of the recent additions from omniOS CE
illumos work that introduced LX zones and bhyve? If it is already in the
openIndiana repository, how can I update my current hipster 2018.04
installation to take in those additions? If not, are there any plans
This is encouraging!
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: wo...@4amlunch.net [mailto:wo...@4amlunch.net]
> Sent: 星期三, 十一月 30, 2016 20:04
> To: Fred Liu
> Cc: omnios-disc...@lists.omniti.com; smartos-disc...@lists.smartos.org;
> Discussion list for OpenIndiana; develo...@lists.illumo
I'm using ConnectX-2 cards in my OmniOS fileserver. Everything works perfectly.
Including SRP (SCSI RDMA). I use it with ESXi hosts.
-brian
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 06:47, Fred Liu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please post if you know.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Fred
> ___
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, Jim Klimov wrote:
A solution of this sort involves running a number of services, such as a stack
of milters, an antivirus engine, a sniffer (p0f), etc. - some with special
privileges and constraints, and thus preferably different accounts, so possible
security issues with
In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [OmniOS-discuss] User/group...:
It would indeed be useful if there was a UID/GID registery for add-on
software and managed by the Illumos project (even if just in a Git
repository). These should try not to conflict with what Oracle Solaris
10/11 and
Of course, meant vboxconfig.sh (not vboxcontrol.sh) :-)
On 07/ 9/15 03:00 PM, Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator wrote:
Hi Jim,
VB 5.0.0 is just released, and I have tried to patch vboxcontrol.sh -
but got error during installation.
So, changed manually lines
273
Hi Jim,
VB 5.0.0 is just released, and I have tried to patch vboxcontrol.sh -
but got error during installation.
So, changed manually lines
273 errorprint "Failed to parse the Solaris
kernel major version."
274 exit 1
to
273
От: Dan McDonald
Дата: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 19:43
>
> > On Jul 1, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> >
> > The corresponding part of the script (and exact command-lines
> involved) are here:
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > { echo "=
> Updating PKG software itself"
> >
1 июля 2015 г. 15:20:56 CEST, Jim Klimov пишет:
>Hello all,
>
>
>Due to my split-root configurations, I often do OI/OmniOS upgrades in a
>pre-created cloned BE (automated by
>https://github.com/jimklimov/illumos-splitroot-scripts since the
>generic beadm/zfs clone do a poor job with customized zfs
Hello Predrag,
Thanks for bringing that bit to my attention - now the same patch is
reorganized (on GitHub) to suffice for both 4.3.28 and 5.0rc1 versions of
vboxconfig.sh.
Jim
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.o
the patch programs.
I also added the copy-pasteable package-patching procedure to README in the
GitHub project to facilitate installations.
Thanks,
Jim
- Исходное сообщение -
От: "Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator]"
Дата: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 14:52
h programs.
I also added the copy-pasteable package-patching procedure to README in the
GitHub project to facilitate installations.
Thanks,
Jim
- Исходное сообщение -
От: "Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator]"
Дата: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 14:52
Тема: Re: [
Hi Jim,
I was curious, so tried to test on *installed* tree (5.0.0_RC1):
$ pfexec bash
$ cd /opt/VirtualBox
$ ls -la vboxconfig.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 0 2 45K Jun 1 20:15 vboxconfig.sh*
$ gpatch -p1 < vboxconfig.sh.patch
can't find file to patch at input line 10
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --s
Hello all,
Earlier in March I posted a patch that fixes installation of VirtualBox on
non-Oracle Solaris hosts (e.g. OpenIndiana and OmniOS). Lest it be lost in the
list archives, I moved the patch (now licensed as GPLv2 to match VirtualBox
licensing) and an accompanying README to GitHub:
htt
Jonathan Adams wrote:
On 3 June 2014 17:18, ken mays via openindiana-discuss <
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> wrote:
Point is there are a few options and custom servers or the cheap ones on
eBay for <$500 (i.e. Dell R710 or similar)...
minor nit. the Dell R710's have Broadcom network
On 3 June 2014 17:18, ken mays via openindiana-discuss <
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> wrote:
> Point is there are a few options and custom servers or the cheap ones on
> eBay for <$500 (i.e. Dell R710 or similar)...
>
minor nit. the Dell R710's have Broadcom network cards that didn't pl
I like what Ian said. although, 4U is a bit daunting.
You can opt for 1U-2U, 1-2 processors.
You can have a chassis with 8 drive bays. Fit for >= 18TB of storage.
>From there you can get solid state HDs and regular drives of your choice.
>Simple controller that can handle them - and has a drive
Jim Klimov wrote:
Thus the box we'd build should be good with storage (including responsive
read-write NFS) and VM hosting. I am not sure whether OI, OmniOS or ESX(i?)
with HBA passthrough onto an illumos-based storage/infrastructure services VM
would be a better fit. Also, I was away from sho
them. Giving a try with
ntfs-3g soon ;-)
I'll let you know.
Cheers,
Fabio
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Jean-Pierre
Gesendet: 04.01.13 18:20 Uhr
An: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Betreff: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [OmniOS-discuss] [smartos-discuss] Re: Mount
NTFS
Hi Fabio,
Fabio Rodrigues wrote:
Hi Alain/All,
The reason I've decided to send the e-mail is, first of all,
> to find out is there was a solution to natively support NTFS
> that I wasn't aware of and second, in case there was nothing
> there, to make an statement about the issue and that m
Hi Alain/All,
Well, I have about 4.2TB to copy (might have some redundant data that I'll
find out soon), and I know I can copy over rsync, NFS or ssh and I'm not very
concerned with the time it takes to be honest.
The reason I've decided to send the e-mail is, first of all, to find out is
t
Hi All,
Thanks for all the answers. We got some very valid suggestions as the one
below from you Jay, but I must say I'm not very comfortable (not technically)
with it. I believe, as per Jim Klimov and Ken Mays replies, we should have a
proper solution on OmniOS.
Please, don't understand me
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:56:48PM +1100, Denis Cheong wrote:
> That's a lot of issues and questions to raise in the one post!
Sorry :), it was either that or post a dozen different threads ;).
> Let me start off by saying that your intentions are very similar to mine.
> My OmniOS box is the stor
HI
I tried it on a virtualbox machine, and it seems nothing special. :-\
It has its own repository :
http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release/en/catalog.shtml
uname -a
SunOS Omnios 5.11 omnios-79686dc i86pc i386 i386pc Solaris
Paolo
On 04/23/12 06:07 PM, James Carlson wrote:
Richard Elling wro
t: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OMNIOS
On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:27 AM, paolo marcheschi wrote:
> HI
>
> I see that there is a variant of opensolaris known as Omnios:
No, it is an illumos distribution.
>
> http://omnios.omniti.com/
>
> Is that related with Openindiana ?, Are there any a
Richard Elling wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:27 AM, paolo marcheschi wrote:
>> Is that related with Openindiana ?, Are there any advantages with it ?
>
> It is designed for the server market, not the desktop market.
A small amount of searching locates a manifesto:
http://lethargy.org/~jesus/wri
On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:27 AM, paolo marcheschi wrote:
> HI
>
> I see that there is a variant of opensolaris known as Omnios:
No, it is an illumos distribution.
>
> http://omnios.omniti.com/
>
> Is that related with Openindiana ?, Are there any advantages with it ?
It is designed for the serve
On 23 April 2012 14:38, Jonathan Adams wrote:
> their web servers run on Linux and Windows ...
> http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/hosted?netname=SCNET-NET-66-225-209-0-1,66.225.209.0,66.225.209.255
>
actually looking at it they are probably not running windows, except
maybe as an accelerator (sounds
their web servers run on Linux and Windows ...
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/hosted?netname=SCNET-NET-66-225-209-0-1,66.225.209.0,66.225.209.255
"Eweek" announced the OS on 4th April 2012 ...
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OmniTI-Delivers-OmniOS-to-Replace-OpenSolaris-378324/
the
Sounds like a minimal system, closer to SmartOS than OpenIndiana, but
since most of their links were broken so it's hard to compare.
On 4/23/12 9:27 AM, paolo marcheschi wrote:
HI
I see that there is a variant of opensolaris known as Omnios:
http://omnios.omniti.com/
Is that related with Ope
HI
I see that there is a variant of opensolaris known as Omnios:
http://omnios.omniti.com/
Is that related with Openindiana ?, Are there any advantages with it ?
Thank you
Paolo
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.o
32 matches
Mail list logo
