Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Code Bounty (Active Directory Integration)

2012-08-20 Thread Gordon Ross
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:55 AM, James Relph wrote: > Hi Gordon, > > > Apologies, missed this the other day. > > My advice would be to make it easier to use IDMU. The modifications > to AD to support IDMU are quite widely accepted these days, at least > in organizations that have both Windo

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Code Bounty (Active Directory Integration)

2012-08-17 Thread James Relph
Hi Gordon, Apologies, missed this the other day. My advice would be to make it easier to use IDMU. The modifications to AD to support IDMU are quite widely accepted these days, at least in organizations that have both Windows and *nix. The problem is that some of the organisations w

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Code Bounty (Active Directory Integration)

2012-08-09 Thread Gordon Ross
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:59 PM, James Relph wrote: > As may have become obvious from my last few posts we've been looking at > Active Directory integration for the past few weeks (and pretty hard for the > past week). Obviously the CIFS server integration with AD seems pretty > reasonable stra

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Code Bounty (Active Directory Integration)

2012-08-08 Thread James Relph
As may have become obvious from my last few posts we've been looking at Active Directory integration for the past few weeks (and pretty hard for the past week). Obviously the CIFS server integration with AD seems pretty reasonable straight out of the box, but other services that want to use AD