, so that's 12 disks a year per site,
>> for 7 years ... we just had to make sure we got reasonable fireproof
>> safes.
>>
>> The upside to this is that it now so much easier to get back any files
>> that one of our users "accidentally" deletes, or ove
his is that it now so much easier to get back any files
> that one of our users "accidentally" deletes, or overwrites ...
>
>> ----------
>> Da: Gary Driggs
>> A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
>&
ier to get back any files
that one of our users "accidentally" deletes, or overwrites ...
> --
> Da: Gary Driggs
> A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
> Data: 11 giugno 2011 22.56.39 CEST
> Oggett
for OpenIndiana
Data: 11 giugno 2011 22.56.39 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Backups and snapshots
On Jun 11, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Gabriele Bulfon
wrote:
BTW, discussion forked into NFS vs iScsi.
What is your backup strategies on tapes?
That will vary considerably depending on the size of
On Jun 11, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> BTW, discussion forked into NFS vs iScsi.
> What is your backup strategies on tapes?
That will vary considerably depending on the size of your org, its budget, and
the amount of data it amasses & must archive for business needs and/or
compl
BTW, discussion forked into NFS vs iScsi.
What is your backup strategies on tapes?
--
Da: Gary Driggs
A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Data: 11 giugno 2011 17.09.03 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Backups and
On Jun 11, 2011, at 7:04 AM, Michael Stapleton wrote:
> Am I reading it wrong or do you mean it drops off at 16MB, not 16 KB?
Yes, you are correct.
I no longer have the throughput tests I did using Nexentastor on the back end
(changed jobs) so these are using a NetApp with ONTAP 8.0.1.
-Gary
_
11 2:29 AM
> To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Backups and snapshots
>
> iSCSI & NFS are roughly comparable until you get to 16KB file sizes
> and above. This is when NFS starts to drop off drastically for read
> performance without any
What was serving the nfs and iscsi?
-Original Message-
From: Gary [mailto:gdri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 2:29 AM
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Backups and snapshots
iSCSI & NFS are roughly comparable until you get to
iSCSI & NFS are roughly comparable until you get to 16KB file sizes
and above. This is when NFS starts to drop off drastically for read
performance without any caching.
Here's an NFS I/O test on a 1Gb ethernet link and file sizes from 64k
to 16Gb: http://preview.tinyurl.com/44upb5f
Here's an iSCS
On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Is it safe to run postgres and mysql data over nfs?
Can't speak for Postgres, but Oracle likes MySQL on NFS (backed by ZFS).
http://blogs.oracle.com/dlutz/entry/mysql_on_sun_storage_7000 is somewhat
informative. The 7000 series storage they
Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
So NFS wins over iscsi, as I see.
Is it safe to run postgres and mysql data over nfs?
that i can't say. depends on nfs locking issues maybe - out of my area...
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openind
list for OpenIndiana
Data: 10 giugno 2011 22.05.22 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Backups and snapshots
Magnus wrote:
On 6/10/11 3:56 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Thanx for the reply ;)
I read somewhere that NFS is much slower than having an iscsi device.
Somewherelse they said the contrary
On 6/10/11 4:11 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
bummer. nexentastor doesn't either. OI allows either one.
Right now my OI work is strictly on my personal time. But I have the
ulterior motive of using it more broadly in production once I have my
head around it better. It won't be replacing th
Magnus wrote:
On 6/10/11 4:05 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
Agreed. I have seen ESXi get finicky if it thinks the iSCSI target
is offline. One gotcha: it depends if the iSCSI storage is a file or
a zvol. Performance of the former seemed to be about that of NFS -
performance of the latter su
On 6/10/11 4:05 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
Agreed. I have seen ESXi get finicky if it thinks the iSCSI target is
offline. One gotcha: it depends if the iSCSI storage is a file or a
zvol. Performance of the former seemed to be about that of NFS -
performance of the latter sucked (I was see
On 6/10/11 4:04 PM, Gregory Youngblood wrote:
I also prefer NFS for exporting to Linux/Solaris/Unix. Can use to export to Mac
as well, though AFP would allow the mac to use the share as a time machine; I
dont think NFS does.
You can use a pretty wide array of storage back-ends for Time Machine,
Magnus wrote:
On 6/10/11 3:56 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Thanx for the reply ;)
I read somewhere that NFS is much slower than having an iscsi device.
Somewherelse they said the contrary
I think a lot of it can do with the clients being used. But in my
experience here, zfs backed iscsi targe
What I've done is use CIFS server for Windows users, then use autosnapshot to
take regularly scheduled snapshots. For windows users this has the advantage of
the snapshots showing up under "Previous Versions" tab when right clicking on a
file or folder. :)
I've used iSCSI for VMs, but as I und
Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Thanx for the reply ;)
I read somewhere that NFS is much slower than having an iscsi device.
Somewherelse they said the contrary
What if I have a virtual openindiana server? should I zfs over an exported zfs
device?
Nooo...I don't think soso NFS.
Is it good for cyr
On 6/10/11 3:56 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Thanx for the reply ;)
I read somewhere that NFS is much slower than having an iscsi device.
Somewherelse they said the contrary
I think a lot of it can do with the clients being used. But in my
experience here, zfs backed iscsi targets are on-par w
S :) that's why I brainstorm at 22:00 here :)
--
Da: Dan Swartzendruber
A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Data: 10 giugno 2011 21.37.39 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Backups and snapshots
A lot of que
A lot of questions :) What I am doing for various servers: they are
backed up (excluding various dirs) to the OI box via rsync. The rsyncd
config file is set up so that after every run, the destination directory
has a snapshot taken with the date&time. I stopped using iSCSI for the
same re
Hi, I'm in the middle of a brainstorm over backup strategies and snapshots
affidabilities.
What are your final words on backup strategies of ZFS storages?
What makes me brainstorm is expecially snapshots.
How can I consider an iscsi snapshotted raw device safe, when I don't know what
the virtual
24 matches
Mail list logo
