Sorry list, accidentally sent private message here. Please ignore
On 15 Dec 2012, at 15:35, Matt Clark wrote:
> Happy to help!
>
> So yes, it sounds like your problem is getting sendmail to deliver to the
> virtual user mailboxes. Would you consider using exim or postfi
having
> problems from operating system level limitations.
>
> God bless you.
>
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:00 AM, Matt Clark wrote:
>
>> I would highly recommend dovecot as an IMAP server. It's fast, secure, easy
>> to configure, very well ma
I would highly recommend dovecot as an IMAP server. It's fast, secure, easy to
configure, very well maintained and also very flexible about virtual user
management.
See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/VirtualUsers
On 12 Dec 2012, at 03:04, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com
wrote:
> Yikes! I think this
On 18 Nov 2012, at 11:13, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
>
> I understand that replication at the storage level is the Wrong Way(tm)
> to do it, but I need to cover this scenario for the rare cases where the
> application layer can't/won't do it themselves. Most specifically, I
> need to replicate VM bac
When you get it back, do make a backup of it, _offsite_. RAID is not a backup,
and neither is ZFS. Crashplan runs on Solaris and derivatives very well.
On 9 Oct 2012, at 04:26, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> On 10/8/12, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>> However, this time I have a real problem.
>> And it d
n. Of
course if you only had one active FS on a pool, the activity would be almost
pure append, so sequential write performance would be the most important
factor.
On 7 Jun 2012, at 00:10, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Matt Clark wrote:
>
>> Yes, it's inter
Yes, it's interesting to consider the possible real world performance. ZIL
writes, even by DDRDrive's stats, are very closely clustered around the tail of
the ZIL, with most seeks being to near locations - it's certainly not going to
seek more than 8 gig away. So probably just leaving it at on
It's true you need a decent SSD, but they don't have to be expensive. The
Intel 320 series has power loss protection and good performance. The 80GB
(10,000 write IOPS, 10TB endurance) model is available for £100 un the UK.
Every ZFS server should have one!
http://www.intel.com/content/www/u
It may not be as cheap as some, but an Intel 320 series 80GB SSD is still well
under a hundred US dollars, and has full write protection in case of power
failures so sync writes (which is what a ZIL does all the time), are fast and
safe.
On 13 Jan 2012, at 11:56, Matt Connolly wrote:
> Ye
On 11 Dec 2011, at 16:42, Gary Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 03:12:09PM +0000, Matt Clark wrote:
>> Have you tried the web UI on the admin port?
>
> I just tried it. Again, it mostly works. Its GUI console attempts to
> load libiKVM32.so again. That would only w
On 9 Dec 2011, at 16:41, Gary Mills wrote:
> ...
>
> I also had trouble with the GUI console. In this case, it displays
> this error:
> ...
> Is there another one around someplace? Has anyone else solved this
> problem?
>
Have you tried the web UI on the admin port?
11 matches
Mail list logo
