ked, Oracles storage arrays were running Solaris and Comstar.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 20:36 -0400, Heinrich van Riel wrote:
>
> > spoke to soon died again.
> > Give up. Just posting the result in case someone else run into issues
> with
> > fc target and fi
it is not able to the same as
OI. clearly a problem with comstar's ability to deal with fc. after a hard
reset it will work for again a short bit
Last post
Cheers
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Heinrich van Riel <
heinrich.vanr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> switch to the qlogic adpater
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Heinrich van Riel <
> heinrich.vanr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I took a look at every server that I knew I could power down or that is
>> slated for removal in the future and I found a qlogic adapter not in use.
Thanks, I missed that. I am good now.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Jan Owoc wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Jan Owoc wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Heinrich van Riel
> > wrote:
> >> Since there is a split pool version is versi
fc target is
no longer an option, but I will post in the ora solaris forum. Either this
has been an issue for some time or it is a hardware combination or perhaps
I am doing something seriously wrong.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Heinrich van Riel <
heinrich.vanr...@gmail.com> wrote
Thank you for clearing it up
I created version 28 while management decide is they will license oracle
solaris so that I can go back to OI.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/ope
Since there is a split pool version is version 28 the highest that would be
compatible between the releases or can I import a version 29 created in
Oracle into Illumos?
Thanks,
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http
back to windows storage spaces. Cant backup the current lab
on the EMC array to this node in any event since there is no ip
connectivity and fc is a dream.
Guess I am the only one trying to use it as an fc target and these problems
are not noticed.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Heinrich van
Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Heinrich van Riel <
heinrich.vanr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> New card, different PCI-E slot (removed the other one) different FC switch
> (same model with same code) older hba firmware (2.72a2) = same result.
>
> On the setting changes when it boots it co
with no issues, but was using an
older emulex HBA, LP1 PCIX
Looking at the notable changes in the release notes past a5 I do see
anything that changed that I would think would cause the behavior. Would
this just be a waste of time?
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Heinrich van Riel <
heinr
place the LPe11002 with a brand
new unopened one and then give up on FC on OI.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Heinrich van Riel <
heinrich.vanr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did find this in my inbox from 2009, I have been using FC with ZFS for
> quite sometime and only recently retire
does not appear to
be a good fit since sun mostly used qlogic.
guess it is back to iscsi only for now.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Heinrich van Riel <
heinrich.vanr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I changed the settings. I do see it writing all the time now, but the link
> still dies a
low
>
>
> On 2013-06-07 20:42, Heinrich van Riel wrote:
>
>> One sec apart cloning 150GB vm from a datastore on EMC to OI.
>>
>> alloc free read write read write
>> - - - - - -
>> 309G 54.2T 81 48 452K 1.34M
>> 309G 54.2T 0 8.17K 0
Thank you for all the information. Ordered the SAS SSD.
I somewhat got tired of iscsi and the networking stuff around it and went
to good ol FC. Some hypervisors will still use iSCSI.
Speed is ok
One sec apart cloning 150GB vm from a datastore on EMC to OI.
alloc free read write read write
-
deal with 1Gbps for the storage. The request is
to run ~90 VMs on 8 servers connected.
Thank you all for all the responses.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Saso Kiselkov wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 23:52, Heinrich van Riel wrote:
> > Any pointers around iSCSI performance focused on r
Any pointers around iSCSI performance focused on read speed? Did not find
much.
I have 2 x rz2 of 10x 3TB NL-SAS each in the pool. The OI server has 4
interfaces configured to the switch in LACP, mtu=9000. The switch (jumbo
enabled) shows all interfaces are active in the port channel. How can I ca
I tried both 4.2.6 & 4.2.8, I did not create the file in /etc.
So that would explain that problem.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On 2013-03-01 07:07, Jerry Kemp wrote:
>
>> You tried the latest version - 4.2.6, right?
>>> I'm sure you meant the latest version - 4.2.8 .
).
I am going to assume it was related to the vbox install failures and move
on, do not have the time to dig into it.
Thanks,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Heinrich van Riel <
heinrich.vanr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It had the same behavior with 151a5 and 151a7. It is not really doing
&
till waiting for the sas disks
for the rpool, so a reinstall will happen at that point.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Heinrich van Riel wrote:
>
> I am using the same board with 20 disks. I seem to
Hi,
I am using the same board with 20 disks. I seem to have some stability
issues, all are SAS disks except for the
2x rpool disks (SATA) that I have connected on the the backplane in the
back of the chassis since according to the supermicro documentation
SATA/SAS should not be mixed in the same b
I have been looking at changing from file to zvol, not for performance
reasons.
A few questions on using ZVOL
1. Is it as stable as using a file for disk?
2. Is it possible that snapshots sizes could be smaller vs file? (This is
my main reason, snapshot replication.)
3. Can this be used with KVM?
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Jason Matthews wrote:
>
>
> From: heinrich.vanr...@gmail.com [mailto:heinrich.vanr...@gmail.com]
>
>
> > My point is most high end storage units has some form of data
> > verification process that is active all the time.
>
> As does ZFS. The blocks are checksumed
memory
>
> Kind regards,
>
> The out-side
>
> Op 12 okt. 2012 om 18:13 heeft "Udo Grabowski (IMK)" <
> udo.grabow...@kit.edu> het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On 12/10/2012 16:10, Heinrich van Riel wrote:
> >>
> >> My concern is as foll
Hello everyone,
I have a question around memory utilization.
Recently we had a system that started to lock up daily and we had to swap
it out with a lab system running 151a5 and Virtualbox.
lab system: 2x AMD 6 core, 32GB Mem. (no KVM support for AMD)
The lab system use to run an Exchange 2010 la
24 matches
Mail list logo
