On 2/5/25 09:24, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
The desktop has never (except one experimental 3D thing that I forget the name of, that didn't last)
That would have been Project Looking Glass.
been its strong point, but I suspect that's had a very few people working it,
who also had userland dut
On 2/5/25 08:53, Udo Grabowski (IMKASF) wrote:
as Oracle pulls the plug on Solaris (which will happen in 2031).
Oracle is currently offering Solaris support until November 2037.
-alan-
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss
On 1/29/25 05:47, Udo Grabowski (IMKASF) wrote:
So is this a divergence between Solaris and OI, or has this library
just been linked to the wrong threads instead of libpthread.so ?
That looks like they did something very weird and broken linking it -
Solaris doesn't have a library named just "t
On 10/23/24 15:22, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 12:13:11AM +0200, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 03:09:23PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith via
openindiana-discuss wrote:
On 10/23/24 14:03, Peter Tribble wrote:
One other thing that occurs to me: does OpenIndiana still run
On 10/23/24 14:03, Peter Tribble wrote:
One other thing that occurs to me: does OpenIndiana still run a find to see
if the
cache needs to be regenerated due to new loaders? I largely removed all
that logic
because (a) it was quicker to refresh the caches than work out if it was
necessary,
and (b)
On 10/16/24 03:05, Marcel Telka wrote:
This happens when you:
1) installed openssh long time ago, and
2) edited /etc/ssh/sshd_config.
Both is common, and #2 is unfortunate. It basically causes that people
usually run sshd with outdated configuration. Most distributions
already noticed it and s
On 8/27/24 03:06, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
Any chance to get that SUNpublic version into libc.so.1 ? Any linker/
elfedit trick possible to get that running ?
The normal way would be to add SUNWpublic to usr/src/lib/libc/port/mapfile-vers
when building libc. I don't know if there's an easy wa
[Apologies to OI folks, I realize we're getting further and further off-topic
here.]
On 8/2/24 15:12, Ignacio Soriano Hernandez wrote:
I just hope there will be an updated CBE this year after 2 and a half years of
the kast build.
So do I, and we're putting in a lot of work to try to make tha
x27;t have acceleration for
non-NVIDIA devices.
-alan-
On 8/2/24 14:52, Ignacio Soriano Hernandez wrote:
Alan,
Ok, having said that what does it mean for Solaris as well? No more accelerated
NVIDIA? No more desktop for Solaris?
Cheers
Iggi
Am 02.08.2024 um 22:37 schrieb Alan Coope
On 8/2/24 12:48, Tim Mooney via openindiana-discuss wrote:
In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] gfxdrm/OpenGL error with latest...:
On 8/2/24 10:39, Till Wegmueller wrote:
This is a known issue since the last Mesa update and seems to come from the
changes Solaris did to it's platform Suppor
On 8/2/24 10:39, Till Wegmueller wrote:
This is a known issue since the last Mesa update and seems to come from the
changes Solaris did to it's platform Support by disabling Intel completely
Upstream for Solaris and hardlinking the driver to Swrast.
Solaris no longer includes any DRI/KMS drive
On 5/14/24 11:13, Rainer Heilke wrote:
I think that before I start asking questions, I need to wrap my head around the
general structure of RBAC. What comes first, that sort of thing. Then my
questions will at least make sense, and I won't be wasting everyone's time.
I think the Solaris rbac(7
On 5/7/24 12:15, Rainer Heilke wrote:
I'm getting the feeling this isn't possible. To wit:
Xorg.0.log doesn't exist (which seems odd...)
That suggests nothing is even trying to run X11, which could be because it
wasn't installed, as Till suggested.
dmesg shows:
May 7 04:22:25 omar nvidia_mo
/var/log/Xorg.0.log should have information on what config files the X server
read, what devices it actually found, and what decisions it made on which
driver to use for them.
It would have to be a very old motherboard to have an Intel graphics chip
that's not part of an Intel CPU - they merged t
On 5/6/24 18:29, Rainer Heilke wrote:
On 5/6/24 18:10, Rainer Heilke wrote:
Greetings.
Which file is Hipster using to define the video driver to use? X is trying to
use the NVidia driver, which fails. Under FreeBSD, the Intel driver worked,
so I'm hoping it will here as well. But none of the
On 5/6/24 18:10, Rainer Heilke wrote:
Greetings.
Which file is Hipster using to define the video driver to use? X is trying to
use the NVidia driver, which fails. Under FreeBSD, the Intel driver worked, so
I'm hoping it will here as well. But none of the files I've found that mention
the NVid
16 matches
Mail list logo
