On 02/16/15 11:06 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
We currently support (in some way) 32-bit systems. We avoid shipping
64-binaries in default path or use isaexec for such things.
But do we really need it? I haven't seen PC (not speaking about
server) without 64-bit CPU for at least 8 year
I was meaning to compose something to this effect, but Peter, you've put
it perfectly.
Despite personally having moved off of 32-bit in the nineties, I agree
with Peter and would rather see 32-bit remain for now.
Might come in handy for the ARM port, too ;)
--jake
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We currently support (in some way) 32-bit systems. We avoid shipping
> 64-binaries in default path or use isaexec for such things.
> But do we really need it? I haven't seen PC (not speaking about server)
> without 64-bit CPU
I don't personally use NDIS for my wireless (I bought Intel to make sure I
didn't) but if this is still being used by anyone then 32-bit support is
generally mandated for a lot of that.
Apart from that, I still have Solaris 10 for 32-bit, and an Ubuntu install
server for anything more ancient (pre
