On Sat, 24 May 2014, cjt wrote:
http://ptribble.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/building-illumos-gate-on-tribblix.html
Interesting, but what's the rationale for Tribblix, given the availability of
OpenIndiana?
Tribblix is officially maintained by Peter Tribble. Who is the
official maintainer of O
On 05/24/2014 10:10 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
I continue to tinker with Tribblix, and a new update (0m10)
is now available:
http://www.tribblix.org/download.html
There are a couple of features that I've been working on.
One is automated installation (done really simple):
http://tribblix.blogspo
On 24/05/2014 10:52 AM, Oscar del Rio wrote:
Another feature of mdbox is that old emails can also be moved to
alternate storage transparently to the user. If you are running out of
space in the mail spool, move everyone's old emails to another storage
instead of nagging users to clean up. Or
I continue to tinker with Tribblix, and a new update (0m10)
is now available:
http://www.tribblix.org/download.html
There are a couple of features that I've been working on.
One is automated installation (done really simple):
http://tribblix.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/cardigan-automated-install-for-
On 24/05/2014 4:27 AM, cpforum wrote:
Yes if you choose dovecot as an IMAP server it's better to use dovecot local
delivery agent.
Related conf in M4 cf file
FEATURE(`local_procmail',
`/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda',`/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda
-d $u')
Or Dovecot's LMTP
> If you already have dovecot, you can use dovecot itself as local
> delivery agent or LMTP. Then you can use Sieve instead of procmail for
> filtering.
Yes if you choose dovecot as an IMAP server it's better to use dovecot local
delivery agent.
Related conf in M4 cf file
FEATURE(`local_procma
