comment below…
On Apr 18, 2013, at 5:17 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
wrote:
>> From: Timothy Coalson [mailto:tsc...@mst.edu]
>>
>> Did you also compare the probability of bit errors causing data loss
>> without a complete pool failure? 2-way mirrors, when one device
>> completely
>> di
Terminology warning below…
On Apr 18, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
> Am 18.04.2013 03:09, schrieb openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org:
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:21:08 -0600
>> From: Jan Owoc
>> To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Op
On 19/04/2013 11:29 AM, Carl Brewer wrote:
On 18/04/2013 11:08 AM, Jay Heyl wrote:
One thing I would recommend is trying to use the ashift=12 setting to
force
the use of 4k blocks. I ran into problems because my initial pools were
created with 512-byte blocks. When I bought some spare drives I
Thanks very much for your replies, gentlemen. zdb -l indeed shows the disk
to be in a pool "rpool" with c2d0, which led me to realize I had made
mistake: I was looking at the wrong disk.
Some background information: initial configuration was two pools: "rpool"
and "media", each a simple two disk m
