On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
> I am making an assumption from the contents of this thread that 151a7
> has been released.
>
> I have just reconfirmed that I am already subscribed to:
>
> OpenIndiana-announce
>
> What mailing list do I need to be on to get announcements of rel
I am making an assumption from the contents of this thread that 151a7
has been released.
I have just reconfirmed that I am already subscribed to:
OpenIndiana-announce
What mailing list do I need to be on to get announcements of releases?
Thank you,
Jerry
On 10/10/12 09:19 AM, ken mays wrote:
On 10/10/12 02:49 PM, Roel_D wrote:
> I am still wondering how a company can take opensource products and build a
> commercial closed source around it.
It all depends on the license terms that the copyright owner chooses to make
the code available under. Many open source licenses offer terms th
I am still wondering how a company can take opensource products and build a
commercial closed source around it. Hence the ZFS code.
Kind regards,
The out-side
Op 10 okt. 2012 om 21:46 heeft Alan Coopersmith
het volgende geschreven:
> On 10/10/12 11:48 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>> Alas, like ma
Boris, logs for these services are located in /var/svc/log. The manifest
contains the other information you might be looking for, under the
tags. Manifests are typically under /var/svc/manifest and then
dig down from there
-Mark
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello list
Wooow Boris,
This is very basic knowledge that is available all over the internet.
Svcs -xv will give all services that failled to start. It will present the link
to the logfile of the service.
Svccfg servicename will point you to all properties involved.
Tip: install webmin and there will
Hello listmates,
I am starting to master SMF and running into some difficulties. Hence the
following questions.
1) When a service that is to be started by the SMF would not start - is
there any log I should look into for error messages?
2) How do I find out which services the SMF is supposed to
On 10/10/12 11:48 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> Alas, like many discussions about legalities (even those with
> lawyers and accountants and such), there are no concrete good
> answers like "do this" or "don't do that" (except the fighting
> club rule #1 - don't talk about it).
Unfortunately, law is not
2012-10-10 21:03, James Carlson wrote:
In any event, I still think it's somewhere between unhelpful and
downright dangerous to bother with it as part of OpenIndiana. I've
probably crossed the line from "trying to shut it down" to being part of
the problem, so I'm going to try to shut up now ...
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Patents and copyrights are to be feared.
Indeed, though they are very different beasts.
Copyright covers a specific expression of an idea, and exists
automatically. A patent basically covers the idea itself, regardless of
expression, and requires a process to establish.
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jim Klimov wrote:
Hello all,
I was at an Oracle presentation regarding Solaris 11, and they
did mention a number of features which I think appeared after the
code split. Some sound like ideas simple enough to be recreated
without using their source and just make a look-ali
Some mirrors are not updated. check here:
http://dlc-1.de.openindiana.org/isos
~ Ken Mays
From: Yuri Vorobyev
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:43 AM
Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 151a7 text installer
Hello.
Why
Jim Klimov wrote:
> Does anyone know how, in this case, open remakes of proprietary
> tools and protocols can exist (i.e. CARP vs. VRRP, LACP vs.
> EtherChannels etc.?) - is it just good will of a proprietary
> author that doesn't care about hunting for imposters, or even
> embraces their resulting
2012-10-10 16:25, James Carlson пишет:
Jim Klimov wrote:
So, the main question of this post is: in legislations that
are relevant and actively applicable to illumos-derived OSes
such as OpenIndiana, are *ideas* and technical specs (meaning
public-API/config compatible but code-different imple
Hello, everyone
10.10.12 15:51, Jim Klimov ?:
3) Immutable zones (several levels of immutability, with part
of the zone filesystem being read-only) - basically we had
much of this implicitly with sparse-root zones, but the new
feature is a configurable attribute of the (fullroot) z
I think Oracle's position was laid out in the case w/ google over the Java API.
They lost, but I doubt that they've given up.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-d
Jim Klimov wrote:
> So, the main question of this post is: in legislations that
> are relevant and actively applicable to illumos-derived OSes
> such as OpenIndiana, are *ideas* and technical specs (meaning
> public-API/config compatible but code-different implementations)
> patentable and protec
I guess not all mirrors have them yet.
I saw them moments ago, and now I don't, but the listing looks different
too, and .mirror status file is missing now too (not sure on the name of
that file exactly, but it looked like it only contained a timestamp value).
2012/10/10 Yuri Vorobyev
>
> Why
Hello all,
I was at an Oracle presentation regarding Solaris 11, and they
did mention a number of features which I think appeared after the
code split. Some sound like ideas simple enough to be recreated
without using their source and just make a look-alike, with any
other conincidence being pu
Why text installer images of 151a7 build absent?
Where have you looked for it? I see it on the list here:
http://dlc.openindiana.org/isos/151a7/
Yes, i looked at this URL.
Very strange, I can swear i saw only AI images previously.
Thanks anyway.
__
2012-10-10 10:32, DavidHalko wrote:
I tried (unsuccessfully to use zfs send & receive between a 1.5tb zfs mirror on
an ultra60 and a 2tb zfs mirror on a v240 over gigabit Ethernet. Never could get it
to work. The man pages were insufficient under Solaris 10u8 for me to figure it out.
I am not
21 matches
Mail list logo
