The version of gcc 4.4.4 in a5 was packaged incorrectly, and as
botched file permissions. Don't use it, use gcc-3.
Jon, any chance of getting this fixed before it bites more people?
(Also: is the package really 'gcc'? that's unfortunate, I thought it
was being kept to the side for the 151 builds?
I can't remember now but the same problem happend to me on a Linux PC with git
and i solve the problem with other version of gcc.
Let me check on my tiny notes for a correcto answer but you can start with that.
Regards
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar)
-Or
Hi,
I'm using a new, fresh OI 151a5 PC, I installed gcc 4.4.4 through "pkg
install gcc"
Decided to build git from source and error appears, this is part of
config.log file:
...
gcc version 4.4.4 (GCC)
configure:2534: $? = 0
configure:2541: gcc -V >&5
gcc: '-V' option must have argument
configure
Bob Friesenhahn simple.dallas.tx.us> writes:
> Vendor: ATA Product: WDC WD5003ABYX-0 Revision: 1S02 Serial No:
WD-WMAYP3661514
> Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes>
> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
> Illegal Request: 10705 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
Pos
Milan,
Thank you! It worked. Not sure how smmsp got removed, but I added it back
in and now re-running the upgrade command.
C. J. Keist Email:
cj.ke...@colostate.edu
Systems Group Manager Solaris 10 OS (SAI)
Engineering Network Service
Hi,
CJ Keist píše v st 18. 07. 2012 v 15:10 -0600:
> All,
>I was trying upgrade from oi_148 to oi_151a and it failed with message
> below:
>
> Update Phase 10094/33221 The running system has
> not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the runn
All,
I was trying upgrade from oi_148 to oi_151a and it failed with message below:
Update Phase 10094/33221 The running system has not
been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system.
This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmp9vJXh7 should you
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:51:01AM -0500, you (Bob Friesenhahn) sent the
following to [openindiana-discuss] :
> On my system, 'iostat -E' is reporting an increasing 'Illegal
> Request' count for SATA drives. I have one drive which is up to a
> count of 10705 which is now incrementing at a rate of
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:56:28AM -0400, you (Daniel Kjar) sent the following
to [openindiana-discuss] :
> Not sure what I am looking for in here. It looks like it would have
> used my ipf.conf if I had 'upgraded' but I don't see anything else
> in there that helps.
Is ipfilter truly online?
Wh
On my system, 'iostat -E' is reporting an increasing 'Illegal Request'
count for SATA drives. I have one drive which is up to a count of
10705 which is now incrementing at a rate of 12 per minute:
Vendor: ATA Product: WDC WD5003ABYX-0 Revision: 1S02 Serial No:
WD-WMAYP3661514
Size: 500.1
I have been using this as my pkg command on some systems; adding the current
'kernel' package to the list of to-be installed.
currentkern=$(pkg list -v kernel | grep pkg | awk '{print $1}') ; pkg install
--deny-new-be $currentkern *packagetobeinstalled*
Try it with '-nv' first; and verify t
If you add set -x to the beginning of the script, the service log will
show what instructions are actually being executed.
#!/sbin/sh
set -x
#
# CDDL HEADER START
#
# The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
Mike
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:56 -0400, Daniel Kjar wrote:
> Not su
hmmm
Think I found it... maybe. I made sure ipfilter was down and did the
| svcadm refresh ipfilter:default
then started ipfilter. Now it is golden. Time to write myself some notes...
|
On 07/18/12 09:58 AM, Michael Stapleton wrote:
A look at the service script might help isolate the
Not sure what I am looking for in here. It looks like it would have
used my ipf.conf if I had 'upgraded' but I don't see anything else in
there that helps.
If I didn't use a custom file how would a person go about changing
ipfilters to suit?
Is that what you are supposed to do?
On 07/18/12
A look at the service script might help isolate the problem
more /lib/svc/method/ipfilter
There are some interesting comments in it that might be related.
Mike
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:34 -0400, Daniel Kjar wrote:
> Yes, and that does it but then I have to go in and remove all the quick
> sta
Yes, and that does it but then I have to go in and remove all the quick
statements that it automagically generates.
What I don't understand is when I check the settings, everything looks
right..
|# svccfg -s ipfilter:default listprop firewall_config_default/policy
firewall_config_default/poli
Daniel,
Yes, have found ipfilter to be quite fiddly... Have you tried to manually
reload the filter rules with something like:
ipf -f /path/to/ipf.conf ? (or, similarly: ipnat -f (etc) ???
Lou Picciano
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Kjar"
To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana
This seems to agree with what little I know about the command.
Does anyone actually know if it's accurate for OI151_a5?
Otherwise I shall have to test every detail :-)
On 2012-07-18 14:31, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:37:36 +1000
On 18 July 2012 13:30, Michael Stapleton
wrote:
> I have one more idea that is more fun...
Very nice! This works perfectly.
Thank you very much for this.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/
How do you 'correctly' modify the ipfilter settings with this new
'ignore /etc/ipf/ipf.conf' set up in OI? I tried
following the directions on
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+on/2009022302
but nothing changes. This is on a fresh 151a5 install. How is a person
supposed to
I have one more idea that is more fun...
I have all my ISO files in /ISO
My /etc/auto_master:
# Master map for automounter
#
+auto_master
/net-hosts -nosuid,nobrowse
/home auto_home -nobrowse
/mountedISO auto_iso
My /etc/auto_iso
* -fstype=hsfs :/ISO/
I have a bit more time to answer more fully now.
Add a line to the /etc/auto_master file for a direct map
# cat /etc/auto_master
# Master map for automounter
#
+auto_master
/net-hosts -nosuid,nobrowse
/home auto_home -nobrowse
/- auto_direct
C
On 17 July 2012 17:50, Michael Stapleton
wrote:
> Or a job for autofs.
>
> Check out the man page for automount.
>
Thanks for the suggestion. The automount option does sound cleaner,
although the init script option has the advantage of being very, very
simple.
I'll look into exactly how the auto
Hi Oliver,
The Xeon E5440 should work fine with KVM.
max
On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:27 AM, Weiergräber, Oliver H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as implemented in OpenIndiana, KVM is said to require EPT, which is available
> in Intel's Nehalem-based CPUs.
> My xw8600 workstation has Xeon E5440 processors whi
On 18 July 2012 18:29, Hans J. Albertsson
wrote:
> There's no ipadm manual in the OI151_a5 distro.
>
> Since the Oracle Solaris ipadm command has changed a bit over the years, I'm
> reluctant to trust the oracle solaris 11 ipadm manual.
>
> Can anyone point me to an accurate manual for the 151a5 i
There's no ipadm manual in the OI151_a5 distro.
Since the Oracle Solaris ipadm command has changed a bit over the years,
I'm reluctant to trust the oracle solaris 11 ipadm manual.
Can anyone point me to an accurate manual for the 151a5 ipadm manual?
___
Hello,
as implemented in OpenIndiana, KVM is said to require EPT, which is available
in Intel's Nehalem-based CPUs.
My xw8600 workstation has Xeon E5440 processors which are not Nehalem-based
but, according to Intel documentation
http://ark.intel.com/products/33082/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5440-(12
27 matches
Mail list logo
