On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Richard Elling
wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Jim Klimov wrote:
>>> ashift=12 (2^12 = 4096). For disks which do not lie, it
>>> works properly out of the box. The patched zpool binary
>>> forced ashift=12 at
On Jun 11, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Jim Klimov wrote:
>> ashift=12 (2^12 = 4096). For disks which do not lie, it
>> works properly out of the box. The patched zpool binary
>> forced ashift=12 at the user's discretion.
>
> It seems like new pools should provi
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Jim Klimov wrote:
ashift=12 (2^12 = 4096). For disks which do not lie, it
works properly out of the box. The patched zpool binary
forced ashift=12 at the user's discretion.
It seems like new pools should provide the option to be created with
ashift=12 even if none of the o
On 12/06/12 09:16 AM, Rich wrote:
Won't zpool replace fail b/c the new disks require ashift=12 and his
existing pool devices have ashift=9?
I have no idea. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to
assume that an error provided during zpool replace would result
in a quick response to the list
Won't zpool replace fail b/c the new disks require ashift=12 and his
existing pool devices have ashift=9?
- Rich
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:12 PM, James C. McPherson
wrote:
> On 12/06/12 08:39 AM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
>>
>> Suppose:
>>
>> I have a system with but two disks. They're fairly sm
On 12/06/12 08:39 AM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
Suppose:
I have a system with but two disks. They're fairly small: 300GB, and use 512B
sectors.
These two disks are a mirror zpool, creqated from the entire disks.
There are about 20 or so filesystems in there.
The system has room for only two
Suppose:
I have a system with but two disks. They're fairly small: 300GB, and use
512B sectors.
These two disks are a mirror zpool, creqated from the entire disks.
There are about 20 or so filesystems in there.
The system has room for only two disks.
I'd like to replace these two small disk
James Carlson wrote:
> For what it's worth (and having worked on the code in the now-distant
> past), I certainly agree with you at a high level. What you're
> describing is an "obvious" generalization of the exclusive stack
> concept. It was "obvious" enough that we actually discussed it
> inter
Jim Klimov wrote:
> 2012-06-11 18:19, Dan McDonald wrote:
>> The fundamental question is always: What problem are you really
>> trying to solve?
>
> Okay, I found another rationale beside performance and simplified
> intra-zone routing (though not as apparent as exclusive routing).
> It seems tha
2012-06-11 22:57, Robert Mustacchi wrote:
This isn't a problem. When you promiscuously sniff traffic on a VNIC
regardless of zone, you only get the following:
* unicast traffic with your zones MAC address
Okay, one problem less, maybe
* Broadcast and multicast traffic
This might expose some
Thanks, Jim! The WWN would be good enough, since all my drives (in the data
pool anyway) have the WWN printed on the top :)
-Original Message-
From: Jim Klimov [mailto:j...@cos.ru]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 3:08 PM
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Cc: Dan Swartzendruber
Subject: Re:
2012-06-11 18:19, Dan McDonald wrote:
The fundamental question is always: What problem are you really trying to
solve?
Okay, I found another rationale beside performance and simplified
intra-zone routing (though not as apparent as exclusive routing).
It seems that the shared IP stack offer be
2012-06-11 21:16, michelle wrote:
Someone posted this comment about my description of the problem on YouTube.
Anyone care to comment please?
nope I don't think it does, I think you experiencing 4K and "Advance
Format" compatibility issues. The solution is a patched version of
zpool. I am not so
2012-06-11 18:19, Dan McDonald wrote:
2012-06-11 18:47, Sebastien Roy wrote:
DAN> The fundamental question is always: What problem are you really
trying to solve?
And as always (or often), it is a valid question.
Technically, there is no immediate problem that I'd solve only
this way, or, lik
Fantastic job!
Thanks!
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Paolo Marcheschi
wrote:
> Hi
> here they are :
>
>
> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/13.0/contrib/so
> laris_pkgadd/
>
> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/13.0/contri
> b/solaris_pk
Someone posted this comment about my description of the problem on YouTube.
Anyone care to comment please?
nope I don't think it does, I think you experiencing 4K and "Advance
Format" compatibility issues. The solution is a patched version of
zpool. I am not so sure that OpenIndiana has been u
Hmmm, nothing obvious leaps out. Looking at output from sasinfo command:
sasinfo target-port -v
Target Port SAS Address: 50014ee204411a53
Type: SATA Device
HBA Port Name: /dev/cfg/c13
Expander Device SAS Address: None (Failed to Get Attached Port)
Target Port SAS Address: 50014e
Ah, I think I know what happened. It didn't seem to want me to execute it
while it was on that cifs shared dataset. No idea why. I copied it to a
system directory and it runs fine now. Go figure. Now I need to figure out
how to use it to figure out what "Target 9" is...
-Original Message-
> I added that because I have a folder with the Win32/Linux x86/Solaris
> x86 binaries all in it; it should be the same file you have.
>
> I'm wondering if there's any problems with executing binaries from the
> FS or user you were?
I seem to recall you see that "Killed" behavior when there is som
> I added that because I have a folder with the Win32/Linux x86/Solaris
> x86 binaries all in it; it should be the same file you have.
>
> I'm wondering if there's any problems with executing binaries from the
> FS or user you were?
I was running as root. I ssh'ed to the OI box, ran 'sudo -i' and
I would guess the error you're having involves the devices having
different block sizes.
# ./smartctl -d sat -i /dev/rdsk/c7t5000C5003886DDA4d0s0
smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [i386-pc-solaris2.11] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
=== START
I added that because I have a folder with the Win32/Linux x86/Solaris
x86 binaries all in it; it should be the same file you have.
I'm wondering if there's any problems with executing binaries from the
FS or user you were?
- Rich
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
>
> The program I was t
The program I was trying to run didn't have the SUNOS on the end.
Unfortunately, my VPN to home seems to be down, so I cannot check now.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/o
That's news to me. Are you sure you're running the correct executable?
# ./sas2ircu.SunOS
LSI Corporation SAS2 IR Configuration Utility.
Version 13.00.00.00 (2012.02.17)
Copyright (c) 2009-2012 LSI Corporation. All rights reserved.
SAS2IRCU: No command specified.
sas2ircu...
where is:
thanks, i got it. unfortunately, the solaris x86 executable doesn't seem to
run under openindiana. Here is the result:
root@nas:/tank/windows/dswartz# file sas2ircu
sas2ircu: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1, dynamically
linked, stripped
root@nas:/tank/windows/dswartz# ./sas2ircu
Hello all,
In OpenSolaris and its descendants it is possible to create
local zones (LZ) which share an IP stack with the global zone
(GZ) or have an exclusive IP stack. While exclusive stacks
have better separation between zones, the shared stacks may
yield higher performance comparable to loop
2012-06-11 17:10, Dan Swartzendruber пишет:
How do I map 'target 9' to a drive? Google was not remotely helpful - the
only thread I found recommended downloading lsiutil (which I can't find
anywhere). I installed sasinfo, which prints a lot of info, but nothing
obviously useful to me. Any hel
I've been seeing a ton of messages like:
Jun 11 08:59:08 nas Log info 0x31120303 received for target 9.
Jun 11 08:59:08 nas scsi_status=0x0, ioc_status=0x804b, scsi_state=0xc
Jun 11 08:59:08 nas scsi: [ID 365881 kern.info]
/pci@0,0/pci8086,27d0@1c/pci1000,3040@0 (mpt_sas10):
root
28 matches
Mail list logo
