It is nice talking to oneself, we make a smart and interesting
couple ;) (I do hope some experts would add to this thread)
Apparently, the "quick fix" in smf_netstrategy which just fully
removes the special handling for local zones is a flawed approach.
There are other scripts which seemingly exp
A couple of observations follow...
2012-06-07 11:42, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
I don't care either way about the "bullet point value" of those items
unless someone else cares enough to contribute actual resources to the
project. As far as I know, there is no commercial interest in either of
these (
2012-06-07 22:32, Jim Klimov написал:
Hello all,
I am trying to get automatic networking provisioning for local
zones working, ultimately in order to simplify rapid deployments
of testbeds and per-bug build environments.
In the process I found a few nits, and wondered if I am doing
something wr
FYI ...
rich
Original Message
Subject: Re: Unofficial Solaris 11/x86 3.4 build
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:15:46 +0200
From: Raphael Bircher
Reply-To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org
To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org
Am 04.06.12 23:55, schrieb Nicolas Christener:
Hi all :)
After
Hello all,
I am trying to get automatic networking provisioning for local
zones working, ultimately in order to simplify rapid deployments
of testbeds and per-bug build environments.
In the process I found a few nits, and wondered if I am doing
something wrong or things are according to curr
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:25:01PM -0400, Gary Gendel wrote:
>
> Thanks. I probably should move to ISC DHCP since that's where
> Oracle is headed as well. Should I get the sources and build from
> there or will it be available as a package in the near future?
Yes, both the Sun and ISC DHCP serv
Gary Gendel wrote:
> On 6/7/12 12:17 PM, James Carlson wrote:
>> Gary Gendel wrote:
>>> Moving from IPV4 to IPV4/IPV6 on my home network is like peeling an
>>> onion, so I'm taking it one step at a time. :(
>>>
>>> Currently I only see the old Solaris dhcp server for OI. Can this
>>> handle ipv6?
On 6/7/12 12:17 PM, James Carlson wrote:
Gary Gendel wrote:
Moving from IPV4 to IPV4/IPV6 on my home network is like peeling an
onion, so I'm taking it one step at a time. :(
Currently I only see the old Solaris dhcp server for OI. Can this
handle ipv6?
No. DHCPv6 is really a very different
Gary Gendel wrote:
> Moving from IPV4 to IPV4/IPV6 on my home network is like peeling an
> onion, so I'm taking it one step at a time. :(
>
> Currently I only see the old Solaris dhcp server for OI. Can this
> handle ipv6?
No. DHCPv6 is really a very different protocol from IPv4 DHCP.
(Are you
On 06/07/12 10:08, Gary Gendel wrote:
Moving from IPV4 to IPV4/IPV6 on my home network is like peeling an
onion, so I'm taking it one step at a time. :(
Currently I only see the old Solaris dhcp server for OI. Can this
handle ipv6? I couldn't find any examples but ipv6 support was
superficially
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Jesus Cea wrote:
The implementation is obviously very much simplified by using
discrete contiguous ZILs. Otherwise there is a lot more complexity
and activity to track which I/Os have completed. With the current
approach, only one write is necessary to record that a batch o
Well, this has happened again, exactly a week later, same time too….
So the SSD ZILS didnt do the trick.
I think I am going to turn off the ZFS auto snapshot service ….
Jun 7 15:50:22 hagrid fct: [ID 132490 kern.notice] NOTICE: qlt1,0 LINK UP,
portid 20300, topology Fabric Pt-to-Pt,speed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/12 17:06, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Jesus Cea wrote:
>>
>> I always wondered WHY. What is the point of keeping separate ZILs
>> (one per dataset) when having a discrete LOG device.
>>
>> Any idea?.
>
> The implementation
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Jesus Cea wrote:
I always wondered WHY. What is the point of keeping separate ZILs (one
per dataset) when having a discrete LOG device.
Any idea?.
The implementation is obviously very much simplified by using discrete
contiguous ZILs. Otherwise there is a lot more comple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/12 15:17, Matt Clark wrote:
> That's true, but if you look at slides 24 & 25 of
> http://www.ddrdrive.com/zil_accelerator.pdf you'll see seek
> distributions for a SLOG device with the ZILs for five filesystems
> - although each ZIL is broad
Moving from IPV4 to IPV4/IPV6 on my home network is like peeling an
onion, so I'm taking it one step at a time. :(
Currently I only see the old Solaris dhcp server for OI. Can this
handle ipv6? I couldn't find any examples but ipv6 support was
superficially mentioned in some documents I came
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Matt Clark wrote:
That's true, but if you look at slides 24 & 25 of
http://www.ddrdrive.com/zil_accelerator.pdf you'll see seek
distributions for a SLOG device with the ZILs for five filesystems -
although each ZIL is broadly append only (slides 21 and 22), there
is still
That's true, but if you look at slides 24 & 25 of
http://www.ddrdrive.com/zil_accelerator.pdf you'll see seek distributions for a
SLOG device with the ZILs for five filesystems - although each ZIL is broadly
append only (slides 21 and 22), there is still a lot of seeking going on. Of
course if
> On 06-06-12 21:29, Gary Gendel wrote:
>>
>> My ISP has turned on IPV6 and I can get as many addresses as I want.
>> However, some of my devices aren't ipv6 capable so I have to deal with a
>> mix of ipv4 and ipv6 addresses until these are retired.
>> I turned on ipv6 on bge0 and have both an ipv
19 matches
Mail list logo
