On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Matt Clark wrote:
Yes, it's interesting to consider the possible real world
performance. ZIL writes, even by DDRDrive's stats, are very closely
clustered around the tail of the ZIL, with most seeks being to near
locations - it's certainly not going to seek more than 8 gig
Hi Gary,
On 06-06-12 21:29, Gary Gendel wrote:
My Home OI box currently serves as my router/gateway to my ISP.
Under IPV4 I have
Cable Modem <-> bge0 <-> ipfilter/nat <-> bge1 <-> network.
My ISP has turned on IPV6 and I can get as many addresses as I want.
However, some of my devices are
Gary Gendel wrote:
> The question is: How do I set up things so it works with my internal
> devices? It seems that All I want to do is to leave the ipv4 setup as I
> have it now and pass all ipv6 packets (discovery, etc.) from bge0 to
> bge1 (and visa versa). This way my ISP will provide ipv6 add
My Home OI box currently serves as my router/gateway to my ISP.
Under IPV4 I have
Cable Modem <-> bge0 <-> ipfilter/nat <-> bge1 <-> network.
My ISP has turned on IPV6 and I can get as many addresses as I want.
However, some of my devices aren't ipv6 capable so I have to deal with a
mix of i
Yes, it's interesting to consider the possible real world performance. ZIL
writes, even by DDRDrive's stats, are very closely clustered around the tail of
the ZIL, with most seeks being to near locations - it's certainly not going to
seek more than 8 gig away. So probably just leaving it at on
On Jun 6, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Matt Clark wrote:
> It's true you need a decent SSD, but they don't have to be expensive. The
> Intel 320 series has power loss protection and good performance. The 80GB
> (10,000 write IOPS, 10TB endurance) model is available for £100 un the UK.
> Every ZFS serv
Linux Format did a recent article on OpenIndiana oi_151a in various categories
on how it compares to other alternative distros (i.e. non-Linux). They gave an
average of 3-4/5 stars in all categories, which was pretty good overall.
Linux Format: Issue 158 (June 2012)
Alternative operating systems
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On NFS mounted file systems I often happen to find daemons of the client
> complaining about the hidden .nfsxxx files appearing and disappearing.
> These are often annoying.
>
> Is there any way to let the server completely hide the
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> A remote filesystem protocol by AT&T (and present only in very early Solaris,
> as I recall), called RFS, went to great lengths to provide all the usual
> semantics. You could even access remote device files (although presumably
> both client and server had to suppo
Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Nice discussion.
> Even though I remember not being able to remove because of a bash waiting
> there,
> but probably was a zfs destroy...and IMHO this is a more logic approach
Even there, you can still do it if you want. The issue isn't the "zfs
destroy" operation it
It's true you need a decent SSD, but they don't have to be expensive. The
Intel 320 series has power loss protection and good performance. The 80GB
(10,000 write IOPS, 10TB endurance) model is available for £100 un the UK.
Every ZFS server should have one!
http://www.intel.com/content/www/u
11 matches
Mail list logo
